Ornithological Note 118

Notes on the vocalizations of McConnell's Flycatcher (Mionectes macconnelli)

Peter F. D. Boesman April 21, 2016
Section(s): Voice, Systematics

In the following we briefly analyze and compare voice of the different races of McConnell's Flycatcher (Mionectes macconnelli). We also try to quantify the extent of any vocal differences using the criteria proposed by Tobias et al. (2010), as a support for taxonomic review. We have made use of sound recordings available on-line from Xeno Canto (XC) and Macaulay Library (ML).

Vocal differences between the 2 northern races (roraimae and macconnelli) have already been analyzed by Hilty & Ascanio (2014), but this study did not look at all races and populations. We are doing this analysis here:

Guianan/Amazonian birds (M. m. macconnelli)

Song at lek is a variable series of harsh buzzy notes "rree..rree..rree..rree..". Call is a peculiar nasal descending call followed by a nasal trill "kyaw..jujujujujuj".

song N of Amazon (including Amapa):

max. note length                 0.17-0.22s

min. pause.                           0.09-0.15s

lowest freq.                          1300-1530Hz

Note shape:                         completely buzzy, at bottom frequencies nicely overslurred

song S of Amazon river:

max. note length                 0.23-0.31s

min. pause.                           0.09-0.13s

lowest freq.                          1380-1470Hz

Note shape:                         Every note is in fact a composite of some 3-8 well-articulated notes, bottom frequencies are slightly rising

 

Tepui birds (M. m. roraimae)

Song sounds like a jumbled chatter, but when closely looking it is quite similar in structure to macconnelli S of river Amazon but less orderly and especially in the beginning almost without clear pauses

max. note length                 0.24-0.26s           

min. pause.                           0s at start about 0.10s towards end

lowest freq.                          1000-1100Hz

note shape:                          Every note is a composite of several notes, but much less orderly than in macconnelli S of Amazon, bottom frequencies irregular

 

Andean foothill birds (M. m. peruanus and part of M. m. macconnelli ??)

Song is a series of well-spaced short nasal burry notes, occasionally interspersed with a completely different querulous note (described in Schulenberg et al. as tequila? or teeola?) . This song with a two note structure reminds somewhat Ochre-bellied Flycatcher M. oleaginus (as a matter of fact, 2 recordings from SE Peru in ML said to be macconnelli are in fact oleaginus)

max. note length                 0.10-0.13s           

min. pause.                           0.20-0.58s

lowest freq.                          1350-1830Hz

note shape                           very different from all previous, without a buzzy frequency-continuum

special note length             0.37-0.44s

One recording (ML135255) is like a fast version of song of macconnelli race S of Amazon (max. note length 0.15s). This is quite intriguing. Could it be that in this group, this type of vocalization is rather a call??

 

Conclusion:

There are clearly 4 vocal groups.

Song of macconnelli of the Guianan/Amazonian region is readily identified as pertaining either to birds N or S of the Amazon, because of the composite vs buzzy note structure (score 1-2), and the longer max. note length in the south (score 1-2). When applying Tobias criteria, the total score for vocal difference between these 2 populations would be about 3.

roraimae is most similar to macconnelli S of Amazon, but is readily identified by the more chaotic delivery of composite notes with no clear pause at first (score 2-3). Notes also reach lower frequencies (score 2). Total score about 4.

Song of Andean foothill birds (peruanus) is very different in structure, and as such differs in many basic parameters: different note lengths (score 2-3), a two-note structure (score 2)and much larger pauses (score 3). Total score about 5-6. (There is however some reservation, due to one deviating recording, closer to macconnelli). It seems important to further investigate this, as this taxon having structurally the most deviating song,  seems a good candidate for elevation to species status.
 

This note was finalized on 3rd July 2015, using sound recordings available on-line at that moment. We would like to thank in particular the sound recordists who placed their recordings for this species on XC and ML: Bennett Hennessey, Sebastian Herzog, Steven Hilty, Alex Lees, Gabriel Leite, Curtis Marantz, Jeremy Minns, Brian O'Shea, Otte Ottema, Alexandre Renaudier, Mark Robbins

 

References

Hilty, S., Ascanio D. (2014). McConnell's Flycatcher Mionectes macconnelli is more than one species. Bull BOC 134(4): 270–279.

Schulenberg T.S., Stotz, D.F., Lane, D.F., O'Neill, J.P. and Parker, T.A. (2007). Birds of Peru. Princeton University Press. Princeton and Oxford.

Tobias, J.A., Seddon, N., Spottiswoode, C.N., Pilgrim, J.D., Fishpool, L.D.C. & Collar, N.J. (2010). Quantitative criteria for species delimitation. Ibis 152(4): 724–746.

More Information: on118_mcconnells_flycatcher.pdf 


Recommended Citation

Boesman, P. (2016). Notes on the vocalizations of McConnell's Flycatcher (Mionectes macconnelli). HBW Alive Ornithological Note 118. In: Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow-on.100118