Birds of the World

Bridled White-eye Zosterops conspicillatus Scientific name definitions

Robert J. Craig and Peter Pyle
Version: 3.0 — Published April 11, 2025

Demography and Populations

Measures of Breeding Activity

A 2004 study showed that the Bridled White-eye had a daily nest survival of 0.904 in the incubation stage and 0.928 in the nestling stage. Daily and overall nest survival rates did not differ between February−March and April−May. Increased nest concealment, including side and canopy cover, appeared to decrease nest survival, with side cover appearing to have the greatest impact (68).

Life Span and Survivorship

Information needed.

Pathogens and Parasites

Disease

The Bridled White-eye on Saipan and Tinian were almost universally infected with Haemoproteus, a red blood cell parasite, and had microfilariae in an incidence of about 15%. Neither parasite was found in Guam birds (2). Moreover, of 63 Saipan birds collected, two were infected with Plasmodium (avian malaria), and 46 were infected with Haemoproteus. One bird developed pox-like lesions, but the lesions resolved. A potential threat from West Nile virus also exists, as other Zosterops have proven susceptible to this disease, although to date this virus has not been detected in the Mariana Islands (71). Fecal examinations have revealed cestodes (tapeworms) and Coccidia (70).

Causes of Mortality

Depredation

After its accidental introduction to Guam from the north Australia-New Guinea-Solomon Islands region, the predatory brown tree snake (Boiga irregularis) decimated native bird populations within several decades. It had a particularly rapid effect on the numbers of the Bridled White-eye, despite the bird’s previous abundance (72, 41).

Nest predators in the Mariana Islands include the native Mariana Kingfisher (Todiramphus albicilla), the introduced green tree skink (Lamprolepis smaragdina), and rats (Rattus spp.) (40). However, predators such as rats, monitor lizards (Varanus indicus), and cats (Felis cattus) are not known to be major predators of tree nesting birds in the Marianas, although the native Micronesian Starling (Aplonis opaca) has been documented to prey upon nests of other forest birds (68), and white-eyes were observed scolding a Yellow Bittern (Botaurus sinensis), which suggests that this species may act as a predator as well (R.J. Craig, personal observation).

Differences in the rat species occupying Saipan vs. Aguiguan may be related to differing population densities on these islands (73), although no empirical evidence supports this hypothesis. Predation has been suggested to be the causal factor in the decline of several bird species on Tinian (74), although evidence for this is conjectural. Moreover, there is no evidence for a decline of the Bridled White-eye on Tinian.

Exposure

Variable circular-plot surveys on Rota conducted in 1982−2003 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service roadside surveys showed that typhoon frequency or severity might affect the abundance of some bird species (75). Typhoon-related nest failures have been documented for white-eye species (76). However, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service roadside surveys conducted between 1991 and 2010 on Saipan showed no significant relationships between typhoon activity and bird counts (77). Now that a Bridled White-eye population is established on Sarigan (39), volcanic activity is also a potential cause of mortality, as the nearby island of Anatahan and a nearby undersea volcano are both volcanically active (78).

Population Spatial Metrics

Data from nests located in 2003−2004 indicated that Bridled White-eye nest densities ranged from 0−115/km2 in non-native forest and 0−11/km2 in native/mixed forest. Statistical analyses indeed suggested that nest densities were greater in non-native than native forest, with 160 of 198 nests located in non-native forest (68). However, this finding is likely to be an artifact of the comparative difficulty of finding nests in the ~15 m tall native vs. the typically 6 m tall non-native habitats, because the species occurs at far greater densities in native forest and principally occupies the forest canopy there (49, 48, 58).

Population Status

Numbers and Trends

Early reports from Guam described the Bridled White-eye as common (42, 17). In the 1930s, it was still found to be common along roadways (79). However, by the 1940s birds were restricted to certain areas, although Arvey (field notes) saw them at Mt. Tenjo in July, 1946 (1); they were found on the foothills of the Mt. Tenjo area in 1945 and on the edge of forest near Ritidian Point (7). However, they were missed in roadside counts in 1945 (80). Hartin (54) saw white-eyes frequently in 1960, but found them less common than the Micronesian Myzomela (Myzomela rubratra), and King (46) observed them near Tarague Beach. Guam Aquatic and Wildlife Resource notes indicate that the species was found in central Guam in the early 1960's and apparently was common in the Agana Swamp. By the 1970s, it was observed regularly only at the extreme northwestern cliff line near Uruno and Ritidian points. It was rarely seen even in the most undisturbed woods of Northwest Field, only once was present near Pati Point Beach, and was by then among the rarest of native birds. It was uncommon along the northernmost cliffs and rare in the most northern areas of Northwest Field. A small group of white-eyes was seen once in Marbo Annex (Andersen Air Force Base-South), the only plateau record outside Northwest Field. It had one of the most restricted ranges of any native bird and was thought to be near extinction (16). It was reported as last observed in summer, 1983 (72), although the last confirmed sighting was in 1984. The Pajon Basin was the last area on Guam to support the full ensemble of native forest birds at historical densities, with count results high and relatively consistent for the nine species of forest birds present in 1981 and 1982. Declines were first detected in May 1983, when Bridled White-eye abundance fell sharply. They were well underway by May 1984, when four species had been extirpated and two others were in rapid decline. Average counts of white-eyes per survey were 54.0 in 1981, 49.0 in 1982, 0.8 in 1983, and zero thereafter (41).

In 1981, the population estimate for Guam was 2,220, and the density estimate for Pajon Basin was 1,027/km2—the highest density estimate for any species. Before the Bridled White-eye’s decline, it was likely among the most abundant species. Although still common in certain regions, it exhibited a distribution more restricted than any other native forest bird. Over 97% of the population resided in less than 2% of the land area on Guam, and there was evidence that the range had diminished from the previous year. Guam Aquatic and Wildlife Resource personnel recorded the species commonly at Pati Point in 1980, but none were found in this vicinity in 1981 (55).

In 1931, Coultas (field notes) found the species to be common on Saipan and Tinian (1). In 1945, the population on Tinian was estimated at 500+ (81). Moran (82) found it common on Saipan and Tinian and Downs (56) found it to be abundant on Tinian. In 1945−1946, it was described as common on hillsides east of Lake Susupe, Saipan (43). Pratt et al. (83) found it to be the most abundant bird on Saipan and Tinian. In 1977, a density estimate for Saipan based on 7.74 km of survey route was 1,360 birds/km2 (84).

In 1982, the first variable circular plot population survey of all natural habitats on Saipan, Tinian, and Aguiguan revealed that the Bridled White-eye was by far the most abundant bird species on these islands. Computed densities were greatest on Tinian, with 2,931 birds/km2 and a total population of 241,352. There were 2,221 birds/km2 and a total population of 229,138 on Saipan and 1,930 birds/km2 and a total population of 10,763 on Aguiguan. In each case, the distribution was island-wide (36).

Using updated analytic methodology to examine data from several island-wide surveys, estimates of birds/km2 for Saipan were 4,710 ± 332 for 1982 (over twice that of the 36 computation), 5,344 ± 407 for 1997, and 4,713 ± 387 for 2007, with a total 2007 population estimate of 534,029. The 25-year population trend showed no significant change (85). The most recent estimate for Saipan is 4,079 ± 313 for 2018 (86). Using similar updated methodology on Tinian, estimates were 3,508 ± 344 for 1982, 2,997 ± 305 for 1996, and 3,275 ± 338 for 2008, with a total 2008 population of 225,360, and with the 26-year population trend showing no significant change (74). On Aguiguan, updated methodology yielded density estimates of 1,798 ± 280 in 1982, 3,787 ± 712 in 1995, 2,427 ± 306 in 2000, 1,933 ± 200 in 2002, and 7,882 ± 1,233 in 2008, with a 2008 total population estimated at 50,205. The difference in estimates among years was significant (73). However, the wide differences in estimates among years suggests that surveys conducted by multiple and differing observers with varying experience and perceptual abilities may have obscured any actual temporal change in population size. Additional analysis of 1991−2010 standard U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service roadside surveys demonstrated that the Bridled White-eye was the most abundant species and that no significant long-term trends occurred in counts (77).

In a 1990−1993 seasonal variable circular plot study of bird populations in native limestone forest on Saipan, densities were 6,027 ± 1,529 birds/km2 for the wet season and 6,303 ± 1,172 birds/km2 for the dry season. In contrast, there were 3,189 ± 707 birds/km2 for disturbed habitat in the dry season. On Aguiguan in the dry season of 1992, density was estimated at 5,806 birds/km2 for limestone forest. All these studies were performed by a single observer (48). A difference among Saipan habitats in population densities also was noted by Camp et al. (85). In addition to these surveys, in 1991−1992, standard U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service roadside surveys were conducted quarterly on Saipan. January counts averaged lowest, probably because higher winds at this season reduced the detectability of this canopy species. Like most passerines, variation in counts was relatively low (47).

From February 1992 to June 1993 on Saipan, a mark-resighting study of the Bridled White-eye in mixed native and non-native forest used combinations of color bands that permitted identification of individuals in the field. The frequency of banded birds in the population was assessed by determining the proportions of banded vs. unbanded birds at 50 m intervals to 300 m from the banding site. Based on the locations of resightings, banded birds declined in frequency of occurrence, p, from the banding site in an empirically fitted quadratic relationship: p = 1.47x 2 − 1.21x + 53.82, where x had values from one for the basal zone (0−50 m from the banding site) to six for the outermost zone (251−300 m). Based on this relationship, a Jolly-Seber estimate of population density was 7,770 birds/km2. Population densities of this species as determined through this study, and variable circular plot surveys are among the highest ever recorded for birds (47, 52).

Population Regulation

Based on 2008−2018 capture-recapture data from six mist net sites on Saipan, population-growth rate estimates suggested a population decline in the Bridled White-eye, with survival the largest contributor to annual-growth rate. Recruitment was particularly important in driving population growth in years of population increase. Spaced at approximately annual intervals, the mean population growth rate was 0.93, the adult apparent survival probability was 0.71, the recruitment rate estimate was 0.23, the proportionate contribution of survival to population growth was 0.76, and the proportionate contribution of recruitment to population growth was 0.24 (87). Variable circular-plot survey and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service roadside survey data do not support the occurrence of a population decline, however (85, 74, 73, 77).

Cover conversion from forest to anthropogenic-dominated habitats on Saipan has been implicated in producing declines in some of Saipan’s bird species, although the Bridled White-eye population showed no evidence of decline. Moreover, the invasive non-native vine Coccinia grandis, introduced to Saipan ~1998, has altered bird habitat by smothering woody and other vegetation. Fruit-eating birds may have benefited from the fruit-producing vine’s spread (85), and fruit comprises a portion of the diet of the Bridled White-eye (47). Causes for the decline of several bird species on Tinian are thought to be predation and site-specific habitat loss/degradation, such as that due to the expansion of Tinian airport (74), although evidence for this is conjectural. Again, however, there is no evidence for a decline of the Bridled White-eye on Tinian. The greater 2008 population on Aguiguan compared with previous years has been attributed to expansion of secondary forest and particularly Lantana camara thickets into abandoned agricultural land (73). Based on mist-netting studies and foraging observations, Lantana is actively fed upon by the Bridled White-eye (53).

Recommended Citation

Craig, R. J. and P. Pyle (2025). Bridled White-eye (Zosterops conspicillatus), version 3.0. In Birds of the World (B. K. Keeney and S. M. Billerman, Editors). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.brweye1.03
Birds of the World

Partnerships

A global alliance of nature organizations working to document the natural history of all bird species at an unprecedented scale.