UPPERCASE: current genusUppercase first letter: generic synonym● and ● See: generic homonymslowercase: species and subspecies●: early names, variants, misspellings‡: extinct†: type speciesGr.: ancient GreekL.: Latin<: derived fromsyn: synonym of/: separates historical and modern geographic namesex: based onTL: type localityOD: original diagnosis (genus) or original description (species)
Todd E. Katzner, Michael N. Kochert, Karen Steenhof, Carol L. McIntyre, Erica H. Craig, and Tricia A. Miller
Version: 2.0 — Published September 17, 2020
The Golden Eagle is generally monogamous and slowly reproducing (i.e., k-selected). Nests, which are on cliffs, in trees, or on the ground, are frequently reused, from year to year, and pair bonds can be maintained across many years. The time from egg-laying until fledging can last 100 days. However, territoriality can start long before egg-laying, and post-fledging dependence can last long after fledging. Thus, the nesting cycle of southern populations may start in October with increased territory defense, and last up to 12 months, when the young finally depart from the territory. In contrast, northern populations, which are generally migratory, have a much shorter nesting cycle that can start in March and finish in September.
Phenology
Pair Formation and Courtship
In temperate areas where pairs remain on or near nesting territories year-round, new pairs form throughout the year, soon after mates are lost (n = 13) (311
Dixon, J. B. (1937). The Golden Eagle in San Diego County, California. Condor 39: 49–56.
, 424
Hunt, W. G., R. E. Jackman, T. L. Brown, D. E. Driscoll, and L. Culp (1997). A population study of Golden Eagles in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area; second-year progress report. Predatory Bird Research Group, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
; U.S. Geological Survey [USGS], unpublished data). In these populations, aerial display, stick-carrying, vocalizing, and even copulation may occur year-round, but often peak prior to egg-laying in January and February (345
Hickman, G. L. (1968). The ecology and breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho and southeastern Oregon. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washington, DC, USA.
, 470
Hunt, W. G., R. E. Jackman, T. L. Hunt, D. E. Driscoll, and L. Culp (1998). A population study of Golden Eagles in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area: Population trend analysis 1997. Report to National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Subcontract XAT-6-16459-01. Predatory Bird Research Group, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
; F. Isaacs, D. Stahlecker, J. Watson, personal communication; USGS, unpublished data). This process of courtship, nest selection, and nest refurbishment can last > 1 month (MNK).
In the Diablo Range, California, resident pairs participate in courtship behaviors from December to January (424
Hunt, W. G., R. E. Jackman, T. L. Brown, D. E. Driscoll, and L. Culp (1997). A population study of Golden Eagles in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area; second-year progress report. Predatory Bird Research Group, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
). In southwestern Idaho, these behaviors start in late January, and peak in mid-February (345
Hickman, G. L. (1968). The ecology and breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho and southeastern Oregon. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washington, DC, USA.
). In the Mojave Desert of California, home ranges are their smallest in October, suggesting that is when pair formation and courtship are initiating (165
Braham, M., T. Miller, A. E. Duerr, M. Lanzone, A. Fesnock, L. LaPre, D. Driscoll, and T. Katzner (2015). Home in the heat: Dramatic seasonal variation in home range of desert Golden Eagles informs management for renewable energy development. Biological Conservation 186: 225–232.
). Finally, in Alaska, these behaviors begin about one week after the migratory birds return to their nesting grounds (471
Sheldon, C. (1909). List of birds observed on the upper Toklat River near Mt. McKinley, Alaska, 1907–1908. Auk 26: 66–70.
, 343
McIntyre, C. L., and L. G. Adams (1999). Reproductive characteristics of migratory Golden Eagles in Denali National Park, Alaska. Condor 101: 115–123.
, CLM; T. Booms, personal communication; see Movements and Migration: Timing and Routes of Migration).
Nest-Building
Non-migratory adults add material to nests and may build new nests at any time of the year. However, they frequently begin refurbishing nests in autumn, with activity peaking from late January to early March (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
; F. Isaacs, personal communication). In southern California, nest construction begins in fall and continues through winter (311
Dixon, J. B. (1937). The Golden Eagle in San Diego County, California. Condor 39: 49–56.
). In Oklahoma and Texas, nest-building begins in December and January (R. Strandtman in 29
Palmer, R. S. (Editor) (1988). Diurnal raptors. In Handbook of North American Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. pp. 324–380.
), respectively. In southwestern Idaho, a pair of adult eagles was observed building a nearly completed new nest on 26 May after a nesting attempt failed earlier that same year (MNK).
The duration of the nest building cycle varies, but it is probably longer for residents than migrants. This is primarily because migrants do not remain on their territories year-round. For non-migratory eagles, nest construction or refurbishment usually begins 1–3 months prior to egg-laying (444
Aoyama, I., F. Sekiyama, N. Obara, T. Tamura, and H. Sakaguchi (1988). Breeding biology of a pair of Golden Eagles in the Kitakami Mountains. Aquila Chrysaetos 6: 14–23.
). In areas where the Golden Eagle is migratory, nest-building probably starts soon after eagles arrive on their breeding grounds (CLM). Bowl construction (see Breeding: Nest: Structure and Composition) is the last phase of nest-building and occurs a few weeks before egg-laying (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
, CLM).
Timing of the Nesting Cycle
Variation in Timing of the Nesting Cycle
Raises only one brood per season but will occasionally re-nest when eggs fail to hatch (see Breeding: Eggs). Laying dates vary among populations (Table 3) and among years (345
Hickman, G. L. (1968). The ecology and breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho and southeastern Oregon. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washington, DC, USA.
, 472
Camenzind, F. J. (1969). Nesting ecology and behavior of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos L. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series 10(4):4–15, 35–36.
, 473
Beecham, J. J., and M. N. Kochert (1975). Breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho. Wilson Bulletin 87: 506–513.
; USGS, unpublished data). Latitude and elevation account for at least some of the variation in laying dates among populations, such that eggs are laid later at more northern latitudes and higher elevations (Table 3). Even within the fairly small area of the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains of Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico, eagles at more southerly locations and at lower elevations lay eggs earlier in the year than do others in more northern and higher elevation locations (268
Boeker, E. L., and T. D. Ray (1971). Golden Eagle population studies in the Southwest. Condor 73: 463–467.
). However, substantial differences among individuals and years commonly occur within a single region (see Table 3 for date ranges from a single site spanning 6–8 weeks).
Factors besides latitude and elevation also influence laying dates. In western Arizona, laying dates may be synchronized with rainfall patterns and reproduction by prey (210
Millsap, B. A. (1981). Distributional status of Falconiformes in west central Arizona with notes on ecology, reproductive success, and management. U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau Land Management, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
). Eagles in interior Alaska may lay eggs earlier in years when snowshoe hare and willow ptarmigan are in the higher phases of their population cycles (CLM). In, southwestern Idaho, hatching dates, which relate to laying dates, are related to both winter severity and jackrabbit abundance. Eagles hatch earlier when rabbits are abundant and later after severe winters (474
Steenhof, K., M. N. Kochert, and T. L. McDonald (1997). Interactive effects of prey and weather on Golden Eagle reproduction. Journal of Animal Ecology 66: 350–362.
).
Timing of Laying
Eggs are laid from late January to mid-February in Washington, southeastern Oregon, southwestern Idaho, north-central Utah, the Four Corners Region, west-central California, and southern California (311
Dixon, J. B. (1937). The Golden Eagle in San Diego County, California. Condor 39: 49–56.
, Table 3). Egg-laying begins slightly later (early to mid-March) in Wyoming and northeastern Colorado (Table 3). Laying usually occurs from late March through early May on the northern breeding grounds in Alaska and western Canada, with most clutches completed by mid-April (475
McIntyre, C. L., and J. H. Schmidt (2012). Ecological and environmental correlates of territory occupancy and breeding performance of migratory Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos in interior Alaska. Ibis 154: 124–135.
, 131
Young, D. D., Jr., C. L. McIntyre, P. J. Bente, T. R. McCabe and R. E. Ambrose (1995). Nesting by Golden Eagles on the north slope of the Brooks Range in northeastern Alaska. Journal of Field Ornithology 66: 373–379.
, CLM; Figure 1).
Timing of Hatching
Hatching dates in western North America range from 10 March to 25 June (Table 3). In general, hatching dates are earlier at territories in the southern part of the distribution of the species and later farther north.
In the Yukon Territory, Canada, eagles hatch in the first week of June (137
Sinclair, P. H., W. A. Nixon, C. D. Eckert, and N. L. Hughes (Editors) (2003). Birds of the Yukon Territory. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
). On the Seward Peninsula, in western Alaska, most hatching, occurs during the first half of June, with some earlier clutches hatching by the third week of May (172
Kessel, B. (1989). Birds of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska: Their Biogeography, Seasonality and Natural History. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks, AK, USA.
, T. Booms, personal communication). In north-central Quebec (50 to 52°N latitude), hatching occurs in late May and early June (n = 22 nests, 7 years; 476
Morneau, F., B. Gagnon, S. Poliquin, P. Lamothe, N. D'Astous, and J. A. Tremblay (2012). Breeding status and population trends of Golden Eagles in northeastern Québec, Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 7(2): 4.
).
Timing of Fledging
Young fledge when 45–81 days old, although the average is ~64 days (390
Gordon, S. (1955). The Golden Eagle; King of Birds. Citadel Press, New York, NY, USA.
, Steenhof et al. 2017; USGS, unpublished data; seeBreeding: Fledgling Stage). The timing of fledging depends on the timing of egg laying and hatching and the duration of the nestling stage. For 1,553 broods monitored between 1966 to 2012 in southwestern Idaho, young were in nests from mid-March to mid-July, and most broods (75%) reached mean fledging age (64-days old) by mid-June(USGS, unpublished data). In central and northern Alaska, most young fledge by early August (343
McIntyre, C. L., and L. G. Adams (1999). Reproductive characteristics of migratory Golden Eagles in Denali National Park, Alaska. Condor 101: 115–123.
, 131
Young, D. D., Jr., C. L. McIntyre, P. J. Bente, T. R. McCabe and R. E. Ambrose (1995). Nesting by Golden Eagles on the north slope of the Brooks Range in northeastern Alaska. Journal of Field Ornithology 66: 373–379.
, CLM; Figure 4).
Timing of Post-fledging Dependence Period
The length of the post-fledging dependence period varies among regions and with migratory behavior (see Breeding: Fledgling Stage). Seven young telemetered in southwestern Idaho fledged between late May and early June and dispersed from their natal territory between mid-August and 31 December (USGS, M. Stuber unpublished data). In southern California, two eagles telemetered as nestlings fledged in May and stayed within their natal territory until October (TEK, TAM, unpublished data). Nine young telemetered in southwestern Montana fledged between late-June and mid-July and dispersed between early October and mid-March the following year (R.H. Crandall, unpublished data).
In contrast, migratory populations have much shorter dependence periods that usually end with the onset of autumn migration. The length of the post-fledging dependence period for 45 telemetered individuals in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, averaged 50 d ± 6 d (269
McIntyre, C. L., and M. W. Collopy (2006). Postfledging dependence period of migratory Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Auk 123(3): 877–884.
). In that study, young that hatched earlier did not start migration any earlier than young that hatched later (269
McIntyre, C. L., and M. W. Collopy (2006). Postfledging dependence period of migratory Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Auk 123(3): 877–884.
).
Nest Site
Selection Process
It is not known how eagles select their nest site, nor which sex is responsible for this selection. Early accounts suggested that females select nest sites (311
Dixon, J. B. (1937). The Golden Eagle in San Diego County, California. Condor 39: 49–56.
). Many territories have multiple nests and it is not known why one nest is chosen for use in any given year (see Breeding: Nests: Maintenance or Reuse of Nests, Alternate Nests below)
Determinants of Nest Location
Despite the lack of knowledge about how nests are selected, there are patterns reported in locations of eagle nests. Local geography is clearly one important determinant. Many nests have a wide view of the surrounding area (418
Beecham, J. J., Jr. (1970). Nesting ecology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
) or are on prominent escarpments (204
Bates, J. W., and M. O. Moretti (1994). Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) population ecology in eastern Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 54: 248–255.
) that provide updraft to subsidize flight (311
Dixon, J. B. (1937). The Golden Eagle in San Diego County, California. Condor 39: 49–56.
). Proximity to hunting grounds is probably an important factor in nest-site selection (472
Camenzind, F. J. (1969). Nesting ecology and behavior of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos L. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series 10(4):4–15, 35–36.
). Finally, protection from predators is also likely relevant. Most nests are inaccessible to humans and mammalian predators (requiring either a ladder or ropes to be reached by humans). In Idaho and in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, > 80% and > 90% of nests, respectively, required rope access (USGS, unpublished data; EHC, CLM).
Weather and microclimate also influence nest location. In southwestern Montana, eagles usually build nests below areas that receive > 500 cm of snow (201
Baglien, J. W. (1975). Biology and habitat requirements of the nesting Golden Eagle in southwestern Montana. M.S. thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
). Weather conditions at the beginning of the nesting season may be critical in nest-site selection in some northern areas (211
Morneau, F., S. Brodeur, R. Décarie, S. Carrière, and D. M. Bird (1994). Abundance and distribution of nesting Golden Eagles in Hudson Bay, Quebec. Journal of Raptor Research 28: 220–225.
). However, the amount of snow accumulated on nests at the start of the nesting season may be, in some locations, more important than local weather (105
Brown, L. (1976). Eagles of the World. Purnell, Cape Town, South Africa.
, CLM). Elevation also may limit distribution of nests at northern latitudes, as higher elevation sites are often covered with snow or ice long after eggs should be laid (CLM). For example, none of the 377 nests monitored in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska for > 30 years were above 1,585 m (U.S. National Park Service, unpublished data). The highest eagle nest detected in the Brooks Range in northern Alaska was at 1,535 m in elevation (EHC, T. Craig, J. Herriges, unpublished data). Farther south, in the Southern Lakes region of Yukon Territory, Canada, elevation of 218 nests averaged 1,268 m (range 670–1,768). In another study in east-central Yukon, 80% of 101 nests were between 1,372 to 1,829 m in elevation (range 1,067–1,981 m; 477
Mossop, D., and R. Hayes (1980). Inventory, population studies and management projects: Birds of prey, 1980 annual report. Yukon Department of Renewable Resources, Whitehorse, YT, Canada.
).
Nest site exposure may be a factor in nest-site selection (478
Mosher, J. A., and C. M. White (1976). Directional exposure of Golden Eagle nests. Canadian Field-Naturalist 90: 356–359.
, 479
Kochert, M. N., K. Steenhof, and J. L. Brown (2019). Effects of nest exposure and spring temperatures on Golden Eagle brood survival: An opportunity for mitigation. Journal of Raptor Research 53: 91–97.
). Eagles nesting at higher latitudes tend to use south-facing locations, while those at lower latitudes tend to use north-facing locations (see Breeding: Nest: Microclimate: Nest Exposure).
Microhabitat
Mainly builds nests on cliffs and in trees. However, when not on cliffs or in trees, eagle nests are occasionally found on the ground (200
Menkens, G. E., Jr., and S. H. Anderson (1987). Nest site characteristics of a predominantly tree-nesting population of Golden Eagles. Journal of Field Ornithology 58: 22–25.
, 480
Ellis, D. H., T. Craig, E. Craig, S. Postupalsky, C. T. LaRue, R. W. Nelson, D. W. Anderson, C. J. Henny, J. Watson, B. A. Millsap, J. W. Dawson, K. L. Cole, E. M. Martin, A. Margalida, and P. Kung (2009). Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor Research 43(3): 175–198.
), clay embankments (334
Houston, C. S. (1985). Golden Eagle banding in the South Saskatchewan River Valley. North American Bird Bander 10: 110–114.
), river banks (436
Phillips, R. L., and A. E. Beske (1990). Distribution and abundance of Golden Eagles and other raptors in Campbell and Converse Counties, Wyoming. U.S. Deptartment of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
, EHC), boulder strewn hillsides (480
Ellis, D. H., T. Craig, E. Craig, S. Postupalsky, C. T. LaRue, R. W. Nelson, D. W. Anderson, C. J. Henny, J. Watson, B. A. Millsap, J. W. Dawson, K. L. Cole, E. M. Martin, A. Margalida, and P. Kung (2009). Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor Research 43(3): 175–198.
), and structures made by humans. Structures used for nesting include windmills
, observation towers (472
Camenzind, F. J. (1969). Nesting ecology and behavior of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos L. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series 10(4):4–15, 35–36.
), nesting platforms (436
Phillips, R. L., and A. E. Beske (1990). Distribution and abundance of Golden Eagles and other raptors in Campbell and Converse Counties, Wyoming. U.S. Deptartment of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
)
, abandoned gold dredges (174
Petersen, M. R., D. N. Weir, and M. H. Dick (1991). Birds of the Kilbuck and Ahklun mountain region, Alaska. North American Fauna 76, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
), and electrical transmission towers (481
Steenhof, K., M. N. Kochert, and J. A. Roppe (1993). Nesting by raptors and Common Ravens on electrical transmission line towers. Journal of Wildlife Management 57: 271–281.
, 209
Hunt, W. G., R. E. Jackman, T. L. Hunt, D. E. Driscoll, and L. Culp (1999). A population study of Golden Eagles in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area; Population trend analysis 1994–1997. Predatory Bird Research Group, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
). In areas where eagles nest on multiple substrates (i.e., both trees and cliffs), there is little indication of differences in survival of nests on different substrates (482
Crandall, R. H., D. J. Craighead, and B. E. Bedrosian (2016). A comparison of nest survival between cliff- and tree-nesting Golden Eagles. Journal of Raptor Research 50(3): 295–300.
)
Cliff nests are most common throughout much of western North America and in some parts of northeastern North America (e.g., southern Quebec (476
Morneau, F., B. Gagnon, S. Poliquin, P. Lamothe, N. D'Astous, and J. A. Tremblay (2012). Breeding status and population trends of Golden Eagles in northeastern Québec, Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 7(2): 4.
)). Tree nests are more common than cliff nests in northeastern Wyoming (200
Menkens, G. E., Jr., and S. H. Anderson (1987). Nest site characteristics of a predominantly tree-nesting population of Golden Eagles. Journal of Field Ornithology 58: 22–25.
, 436
Phillips, R. L., and A. E. Beske (1990). Distribution and abundance of Golden Eagles and other raptors in Campbell and Converse Counties, Wyoming. U.S. Deptartment of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
), the central Coast Range in California (209
Hunt, W. G., R. E. Jackman, T. L. Hunt, D. E. Driscoll, and L. Culp (1999). A population study of Golden Eagles in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area; Population trend analysis 1994–1997. Predatory Bird Research Group, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
), coastal Washington (483
Eaton, R. L. (1976). Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos). In Marine Shoreline Fauna of Washington (J. D. Brittell, J. M. Brown, and R. L. Eaton, Editors). Coastal Zone Environmental Study Report no. 3. Washington State Department of Game Ecology, Olympia, WA, USA. pp. 82–118.
, 159
Bruce, A. M., R. J. Anderson, and G. T. Allen (1982). Observations of Golden Eagles nesting in western Washington. Raptor Research 16: 132–134.
), and Sweden (484
Tjernberg, M. (1983). Habitat and nest site features of Golden Eagle, Aquila chrysaetos (L.), in Sweden. Swedish Wildlife Research 12: 131–163
). Eagles occasionally nest on the ground in Nevada (485
Seibert, D. J., R. J. Oakleaf, J. M. Laughlin, and J. L. Page (1976). Nesting ecology of Golden Eagles in Elko County, Nevada. U.S. Department of the Initerior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, CO, USA.
), Wyoming (200
Menkens, G. E., Jr., and S. H. Anderson (1987). Nest site characteristics of a predominantly tree-nesting population of Golden Eagles. Journal of Field Ornithology 58: 22–25.
), North Dakota (151
Ward, J. P., L. R. Hanebury, and R. L. Phillips (1983). Raptor inventory of coal areas in western North Dakota. Report prepared for U.S. Fish Wildlife Service, Bismarck Field Office, Bismarck, ND, USA.
), and Alaska (T. Booms, unpublished data;, CLM, EHC). A similar pattern is observed in Eurasia, where cliff nest sites appear to be preferred when they are available in appropriate habitat (435
Haller, H. (1982). Spatial organization and dynamics of a population of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the central Alps. Der Ornithologische Beobachter 79: 163–211.
). In Scotland, Bulgaria, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, France, and the former Yugoslavia, only occasionally nests in trees (< 10% of the time) (486
Watson, J., and R. H. Dennis (1992). Nest-site selection by Golden Eagles in Scotland. British Birds 85: 469–481.
, 487
Michev, T., T. Petrov, L. Profirov, P. Yankov, and S. Gavrailov (1989). Distribution and naturedefensive status of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos chrysaetos (L.), 1758 in Bulgaria. Bulletin of the Museums of Southern Bulgaria 15: 79–87
,488
Fernández, C. (1988). El Aguila real (Aquila chrysaetos) en Navarra: Utilización del Espacio, Biología de la Reproducción y Ecología Trófica. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad de León, Spain.
,489
Artese, C., S. Allavena, S. Baliva, M. Bernoni, F. Borlenghi, M. Carfagnini, M. Cirillo, G. Damiani, S. Di Benedetto, and G. Lalli (2017). Status of the golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos in Abruzzo. Avocetta 41: 77–80
,490
Fasce, P., L. Fasce, and F. Bergese (2017). Status of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos in the Western Alps. Avocetta 41: 35–38
, 435
Haller, H. (1982). Spatial organization and dynamics of a population of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in the central Alps. Der Ornithologische Beobachter 79: 163–211.
, 491
Mathieu, R., and J. P. Choisy (1982). L’Aigle Royal (Aquila chrysaetos) dans les Alpes Meridionales Francaises de 1964 a 1980. Essai sur la distribution, les effectifs, le regime alimentaire et la reproduction. Bièvre 4: 1–32
, 492
Grubac, R. B. (1988). The Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos chrysaetos) in south-eastern Yugoslavia. Larus 38–39: 95–135.
). In Mongolia and southern Kazakhstan, most nests are on cliffs, but some are also flat on the ground at the edge of cliffs or on boulder strewn hillsides (480
Ellis, D. H., T. Craig, E. Craig, S. Postupalsky, C. T. LaRue, R. W. Nelson, D. W. Anderson, C. J. Henny, J. Watson, B. A. Millsap, J. W. Dawson, K. L. Cole, E. M. Martin, A. Margalida, and P. Kung (2009). Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor Research 43(3): 175–198.
, TEK). In northern Xinjiang, China, all nests in one study were on cliffs (15
Ming, M., P. Ding, W. Li, Y. Chen, and B. Hu (2010). Breeding Ecology and Survival Status of the Golden Eagle in China. Raptors Conservation 19: 75–87.
). Tree nests predominate in Sweden, Finland, Czechoslovakia, Estonia, Belarus, northern Kazakhstan and the Baltic States (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
, TEK).
In eastern Oregon and eastern Washington, 87% of nests are on rocky substrates such as linear, steep cliffs, disjunct outcrops or talus slopes, and 13% are in trees (407
Watson, J. W., A. A. Duff, and R. W. Davies (2014). Home range and resource selection by GPS-monitored adult Golden Eagles in the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion: Implications for wind power development. Journal of Wildlife Management 78: 1012–1021.
). Of 1,908 nesting attempts documented in the Snake River Plain in southwestern Idaho, 94% occurred on cliffs or rock outcroppings, 4% on powerline structures, and only 1% in trees (USGS, unpublished data). These data may be influenced because surveys focused on habitats where trees are lacking. In a southwestern Montana study area, 24 nests were in trees (46%) and 28 on cliffs (54%) (493
Crandall, R. H. (2013). Identifying environmental factors influencing Golden Eagle presence and reproductive success. M.S. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
), and nest survival did not differ between the two substrates (482
Crandall, R. H., D. J. Craighead, and B. E. Bedrosian (2016). A comparison of nest survival between cliff- and tree-nesting Golden Eagles. Journal of Raptor Research 50(3): 295–300.
). In western Wyoming at 34 nesting territories, two known nests were in eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides), and the remainder were all on cliffs (375
Preston, C. R., R. E. Jones, and N. S. Horton (2017). Golden Eagle diet breadth and reproduction in relation to fluctuations in primary prey abundance in Wyoming's Bighorn Basin. Journal of Raptor Research 51: 347–367.
). In non-mountainous sagebrush steppe and grassland regions of Wyoming, 14 of 36 occupied known nests were on cliffs, 17 were in cottonwood trees, one was on an artificial structure, and four were on rocks or rims (494
Olson, L. E., R. J. Oakleaf, J. R. Squires, Z. P. Wallace, and P. L. Kennedy (2015). Nesting pair density and abundance of Ferruginous Hawks (Buteo regalis) and Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) from aerial surveys in Wyoming. Journal of Raptor Research 49(4): 400–412.
). Eagles also use tree nests in interior and southwestern Alaska, but infrequently, and most nests are on cliffs (212
Ritchie, R. J., and J. A. Curatolo (1982). Notes on Golden Eagle productivity and nest site characteristics, Porcupine River, Alaska, 1979–1982. Raptor Research 16: 123–127.
, CLM, EHC; T. Booms, T. Craig, personal communication;).
A given pair of eagles typically use either cliff or tree nests, but pairs sometimes switch between the two. One occupied nest in Idaho was found in a Douglas Fir tree adjacent to a cliff with a vacant eagle nest on it (T. Craig, personal communication; EHC). The following year the tree nest was vacant but the cliff nest was occupied. From 1981 to 2019, eagles in a single southwestern Idaho nesting territory used nests on cliffs 16 times and a nest on a nearby transmission tower 14 times (MNK, KS).
Cliff Nest Substrate
Eagles build nests on cliffs composed of many types of rock including sandstone, shale, schist, gneiss, greenstone, phylitte, limestone, basalt, and granite (495
Schmalzried, J. T. (1976). Nesting and food habits of the Golden Eagle on the Laramie Plains. M.S. thesis, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
, 480
Ellis, D. H., T. Craig, E. Craig, S. Postupalsky, C. T. LaRue, R. W. Nelson, D. W. Anderson, C. J. Henny, J. Watson, B. A. Millsap, J. W. Dawson, K. L. Cole, E. M. Martin, A. Margalida, and P. Kung (2009). Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor Research 43(3): 175–198.
, CLM; USGS, unpublished data). They build nests along old volcano flows on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska (CLM) and in the Mojave Desert (TEK, TAM). Eagles appear to avoid building nests on loosely cemented materials such as breccias, conglomerates, or agglomerate sluff (201
Baglien, J. W. (1975). Biology and habitat requirements of the nesting Golden Eagle in southwestern Montana. M.S. thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
). However, some nests in interior Alaska are on loose conglomerates and talus slopes (CLM), sometimes supported by piles of guano produced by Cliff Swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota; 496
Ritchie, R. J., and J. Maguire (2012). Peregrine Falcon and Golden Eagles use swallow guano to support nests on the same cliff ledge in interior Alaska. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 408–409.
). A unique cliff nest on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, was on an artificial nest platform placed in a road-cut about 20 m off a well-used gravel road (T. Booms, personal communication).
Tree Nest Substrate
The Golden Eagle builds nests in a wide variety of tree species, including ponderosa pine (436
Phillips, R. L., and A. E. Beske (1990). Distribution and abundance of Golden Eagles and other raptors in Campbell and Converse Counties, Wyoming. U.S. Deptartment of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
; T. Craig, personal communication, EHC), oaks, California laurel (Umbellularia californica), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus), California sycamore (Platanus racemosa; 208
Hunt, W. G., R. E. Jackman, T. L. Brown, J. G. Gilardi, D. E. Driscoll, and L. Culp (1995). A pilot Golden Eagle population study in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. Predatory Bird Research Group, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii; 366
McGahan, J. (1968). Ecology of the Golden Eagle. Auk 85: 1–12.
, 364
Watson, J. W., and R. W. Davies (2015). Comparative diets of nesting Golden Eagles in the Columbia Basin between 2007–2013 and the late 1970s. Northwestern Naturalist 96: 81–86.
, 493
Crandall, R. H. (2013). Identifying environmental factors influencing Golden Eagle presence and reproductive success. M.S. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
, EHC; T. Craig, personal communication), Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii; 204
Bates, J. W., and M. O. Moretti (1994). Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) population ecology in eastern Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 54: 248–255.
), plains cottonwood (375
Preston, C. R., R. E. Jones, and N. S. Horton (2017). Golden Eagle diet breadth and reproduction in relation to fluctuations in primary prey abundance in Wyoming's Bighorn Basin. Journal of Raptor Research 51: 347–367.
), cottonwoods (Populus); 493
Crandall, R. H. (2013). Identifying environmental factors influencing Golden Eagle presence and reproductive success. M.S. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
; USGS, unpublished data), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia; USGS, unpublished data), and white spruce (Picea glauca; 212
Ritchie, R. J., and J. A. Curatolo (1982). Notes on Golden Eagle productivity and nest site characteristics, Porcupine River, Alaska, 1979–1982. Raptor Research 16: 123–127.
, CLM, EHC).
Despite the wide range of trees used by eagles, not all trees are used with equal frequency. Live trees are most commonly used, but eagles may continue to use a nest built in a tree that died after nest construction (TEK), or they may occasionally build nests in dead trees. For example, in southwestern Montana, of 28 known tree nests, 7 nests were in live cottonwoods, 19 were in live Douglas-fir, and 2 were in dead Douglas-fir (482
Crandall, R. H., D. J. Craighead, and B. E. Bedrosian (2016). A comparison of nest survival between cliff- and tree-nesting Golden Eagles. Journal of Raptor Research 50(3): 295–300.
). In a study in northern Wyoming, eagles used large pines more than they used cottonwoods (436
Phillips, R. L., and A. E. Beske (1990). Distribution and abundance of Golden Eagles and other raptors in Campbell and Converse Counties, Wyoming. U.S. Deptartment of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
), although in another study, birds in northeastern Wyoming nested more frequently in deciduous trees than in pines (200
Menkens, G. E., Jr., and S. H. Anderson (1987). Nest site characteristics of a predominantly tree-nesting population of Golden Eagles. Journal of Field Ornithology 58: 22–25.
).
Tree size and location also may influence eagle use. Larger trees may improve nest stability and longevity (200
Menkens, G. E., Jr., and S. H. Anderson (1987). Nest site characteristics of a predominantly tree-nesting population of Golden Eagles. Journal of Field Ornithology 58: 22–25.
). Eagles may avoid building nests in densely wooded stands (436
Phillips, R. L., and A. E. Beske (1990). Distribution and abundance of Golden Eagles and other raptors in Campbell and Converse Counties, Wyoming. U.S. Deptartment of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
). Nesting trees are usually among the largest trees in a stand (200
Menkens, G. E., Jr., and S. H. Anderson (1987). Nest site characteristics of a predominantly tree-nesting population of Golden Eagles. Journal of Field Ornithology 58: 22–25.
), isolated or on the fringe of small stands of timber (201
Baglien, J. W. (1975). Biology and habitat requirements of the nesting Golden Eagle in southwestern Montana. M.S. thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
), and < 500 m from large clear-cuts or open fields (159
Bruce, A. M., R. J. Anderson, and G. T. Allen (1982). Observations of Golden Eagles nesting in western Washington. Raptor Research 16: 132–134.
). In western Washington, eagles nest near clearcuts < 10 years old and they may benefit from openings in dense timber formed by fire and logging (497
Thomas, C. (1977). Golden Eagle nesting in the Willamette Valley. Oregon Birds 2: 16–17.
, 498
Servheen, C. (1978). Mountain beaver as a prey species of the Golden Eagle. Murrelet 59: 77.
, 215
Anderson, R. J., and A. M. Bruce (1980). A comparison of selected Bald and Golden eagle nests in western Washington. In Proceedings of the Washington Bald Eagle Symposium (R. L. Knight, G. T. Allen, M. V. Stalmaster, and C. W. Servheen, Editors), Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA., USA. pp. 117–120.
).
Characteristics of Nest Substrate
Cliffs on which nests are built may exceed 200 m in parts of the Wrangell Mountains in eastern interior Alaska (CLM) and in some parts of east-central Idaho (EHC). Cliff nests are 9–61 m above the Noatak River, Alaska (mean 37 m, n = 25; 499
Amaral, M., and C. Gardner (1986). A survey for cliff-nesting birds of prey along the Noatak River, Alaska. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Endangered Species, Anchorage, AK, USA.
). Nesting cliff and nest heights averaged 22.8 and 13.0 m respectively in the Central Canadian Arctic; 71.9 and 37.2 m in eastern Hudson Bay; 25.2 and 17.6 m in southwestern Idaho; and 21.7 and 15.1 m in northern Utah (134
Poole, K. G., and R. G. Bromley (1988a). Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2275–2282.
, 205
Peterson, D. L. (1988a). Nesting and habitat parameters for selected raptors in the desert of northern Utah. M.S. thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
, 211
Morneau, F., S. Brodeur, R. Décarie, S. Carrière, and D. M. Bird (1994). Abundance and distribution of nesting Golden Eagles in Hudson Bay, Quebec. Journal of Raptor Research 28: 220–225.
; USGS, unpublished data). Ground nests tend to be on hillsides (151
Ward, J. P., L. R. Hanebury, and R. L. Phillips (1983). Raptor inventory of coal areas in western North Dakota. Report prepared for U.S. Fish Wildlife Service, Bismarck Field Office, Bismarck, ND, USA.
). However, one nest in southwestern Idaho and another in interior Alaska were at the base of the nest cliff (MNK, CLM). Another ground nest in western Alaska was on a river bank (< 5 m above the water) (EHC; T. Craig, personal communication).
In western Washington, builds nests in trees that range from 38 to 72 m tall, with nests at heights ranging from 20 to 64 m high (n = 6; 215
Anderson, R. J., and A. M. Bruce (1980). A comparison of selected Bald and Golden eagle nests in western Washington. In Proceedings of the Washington Bald Eagle Symposium (R. L. Knight, G. T. Allen, M. V. Stalmaster, and C. W. Servheen, Editors), Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA., USA. pp. 117–120.
). Tree nests are on slopes ranging from 30 to 88% (n = 6; 215
Anderson, R. J., and A. M. Bruce (1980). A comparison of selected Bald and Golden eagle nests in western Washington. In Proceedings of the Washington Bald Eagle Symposium (R. L. Knight, G. T. Allen, M. V. Stalmaster, and C. W. Servheen, Editors), Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA., USA. pp. 117–120.
, 159
Bruce, A. M., R. J. Anderson, and G. T. Allen (1982). Observations of Golden Eagles nesting in western Washington. Raptor Research 16: 132–134.
). In Wyoming, usually nests in the upper one-third of the nest tree (495
Schmalzried, J. T. (1976). Nesting and food habits of the Golden Eagle on the Laramie Plains. M.S. thesis, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
, 200
Menkens, G. E., Jr., and S. H. Anderson (1987). Nest site characteristics of a predominantly tree-nesting population of Golden Eagles. Journal of Field Ornithology 58: 22–25.
, 436
Phillips, R. L., and A. E. Beske (1990). Distribution and abundance of Golden Eagles and other raptors in Campbell and Converse Counties, Wyoming. U.S. Deptartment of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
).
Golden Eagle nests also may be positioned close to water. In northeastern Wyoming, tree nests are close to water courses (200
Menkens, G. E., Jr., and S. H. Anderson (1987). Nest site characteristics of a predominantly tree-nesting population of Golden Eagles. Journal of Field Ornithology 58: 22–25.
). Similarly, nests in northern Wyoming and southeastern Montana can be in large trees in the bottom of isolated drainages (500
Phillips, R. L., A. H. Wheeler, J. M. Lockhart, T. P. McEneaney, and N. C. Forrester (1990). Nesting ecology of Golden Eagles and other raptors in southeastern Montana and northern Wyoming. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
). All nests within a survey corridor along the Porcupine River, Alaska, were < 400 m of the river, with 84% of them < 100 m from the river (n = 37; 212
Ritchie, R. J., and J. A. Curatolo (1982). Notes on Golden Eagle productivity and nest site characteristics, Porcupine River, Alaska, 1979–1982. Raptor Research 16: 123–127.
). Nests were 0.05–1.2 km from water in a study in southeastern Wyoming (mean 0.3 km ± 0.05 SE, n = 30; 501
MacLaren, P. A., S. H. Anderson, and D. E. Runde (1988). Food habits and nest characteristics of breeding raptors in southwestern Wyoming. Great Basin Naturalist 48: 548–553.
), 1–8 km from water in western Washington (n = 6; 215
Anderson, R. J., and A. M. Bruce (1980). A comparison of selected Bald and Golden eagle nests in western Washington. In Proceedings of the Washington Bald Eagle Symposium (R. L. Knight, G. T. Allen, M. V. Stalmaster, and C. W. Servheen, Editors), Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA., USA. pp. 117–120.
), and 2–8 km from water in northern Utah (mean 2 km ± 3 SD, n = 7; 205
Peterson, D. L. (1988a). Nesting and habitat parameters for selected raptors in the desert of northern Utah. M.S. thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
).
Nest
Construction Process
Adults build new nests and refurbish and reuse existing nests within their nesting territory (502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
). Occasionally eagles build new nests on or near sites of nests that had been destroyed or had fallen off the cliff (502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
). New nests may or may not be used the year they are constructed (311
Dixon, J. B. (1937). The Golden Eagle in San Diego County, California. Condor 39: 49–56.
, 502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
). Of 135 nests in southwestern Idaho for which year of construction was known, pairs used most (86%) nests in the year of construction; a small proportion (5%) were used 1 year after construction, and the remainder (9%) were used 2–11 years after construction (502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
). Of nests built and used > 1 year after construction, 50% were built by pairs that did not lay eggs that year, and 50% were built by pairs that laid eggs in other nests in the year of construction.
In Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, new nest construction may be associated with periods of non-breeding, as most new nests likely are built in years when the territorial pair did not lay eggs (CLM). This behavior suggests that migratory populations of Golden Eagle may be time constrained, with insufficient time to build new nests while also tending eggs or raising offspring. In one instance in Denali National Park, a Golden Eagle laid an egg on a bare cliff and then built the nest around it (503
McIntyre, C. L., and M. D. Paulson (2015). What came first, the nest or the egg? An unusual Golden Eagle nest observed in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Journal of Raptor Research 49: 98–101.
)
In parts of the range where eagles remain on the breeding ground year-round, the nest building process begins in autumn or winter, when the eagles start bringing sticks and branches to at least one nest (for additional details on seasonal timing, see Breeding: Phenology: Timing of the Nesting Cycle). The nest construction process is sometimes rapid but can take 4–6 weeks (R. Strandtman in 29
Palmer, R. S. (Editor) (1988). Diurnal raptors. In Handbook of North American Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. pp. 324–380.
). Resident eagles start to prepare the nest bowl for eggs approximately one month before egg-laying. (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). They also sometimes add material to alternative nests prior to laying eggs (248
Bergo, G. (1987). Territorial behaviour of Golden Eagles in western Norway. British Birds 80: 361–376.
, MNK). Both sexes participate nearly equally in nest building (248
Bergo, G. (1987). Territorial behaviour of Golden Eagles in western Norway. British Birds 80: 361–376.
, 444
Aoyama, I., F. Sekiyama, N. Obara, T. Tamura, and H. Sakaguchi (1988). Breeding biology of a pair of Golden Eagles in the Kitakami Mountains. Aquila Chrysaetos 6: 14–23.
, MNK). Dixon (311
Dixon, J. B. (1937). The Golden Eagle in San Diego County, California. Condor 39: 49–56.
) reported that nest-building in southwestern California (San Diego County) occurred between 10:00–13:00, or after the morning hunt had finished. R. Strandtman reported (in 29
Palmer, R. S. (Editor) (1988). Diurnal raptors. In Handbook of North American Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. pp. 324–380.
) that nest-building in Texas occurred between dawn and 11:00.
Once the nesting season has started, both sexes of eagles continue to add greenery and fresh material to the nest (see also Breeding: Parental Care: Nest Sanitation). The female makes most deliveries of nest material during incubation and brood-rearing (248
Bergo, G. (1987). Territorial behaviour of Golden Eagles in western Norway. British Birds 80: 361–376.
, 444
Aoyama, I., F. Sekiyama, N. Obara, T. Tamura, and H. Sakaguchi (1988). Breeding biology of a pair of Golden Eagles in the Kitakami Mountains. Aquila Chrysaetos 6: 14–23.
, 2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). Half of nests in southwestern Idaho and southeastern Oregon contain fresh nesting material during later stages of the nesting cycle (345
Hickman, G. L. (1968). The ecology and breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho and southeastern Oregon. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washington, DC, USA.
). All successful nesting attempts monitored in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska (n = 805) contained fresh nesting material or greenery during late brood-rearing (CLM). It is not uncommon for eagles to place greenery in alternative nests within a territory (EHC, T. Craig, personal communication). Such behavior may function as a signal of territorial occupancy to other eagles (504
Newton, I. (2010). Population Ecology of Raptors. A & C Black, London, United Kingdom.
, 2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
) or to repel ectoparasites at occupied nests (505
Wimberger, P. H. (1984). The use of green plant material in bird nests to avoid ectoparasites. Auk 101(3):615–618.
in 2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
).
Structure and Composition Matter
Uses a wide variety of vegetation for nest-building, usually reflective of the flora in the immediate vicinity of the nest (345
Hickman, G. L. (1968). The ecology and breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho and southeastern Oregon. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washington, DC, USA.
, CLM). When collecting nesting materials, eagles in Alaska glide low across hillsides, land, walk up to vegetation, and then begin pulling on it with either their bill or their feet (CLM). The pulling action is often accompanied by vigorous wing-flapping and head twisting as the eagle attempts to tear off a piece of vegetation or rip the vegetation from the ground (388
Ellis, D. H., and N. J. Schmitt (2017). Behavior of the Golden Eagle: An Illustrated Ethogram. Hancock House Publishers, Blaine, Washington, USA.
, CLM). They carry sticks and other vegetation to the nest in their bill or feet, depending on the size of the item. Nesting material may include animal bones and shed antlers (506
Ellis, D. H., and R. L. Bunn (1998). Caribou antlers as nest materials for Golden Eagles in northwestern Alaska. Journal of Raptor Research 32: 268.
, 480
Ellis, D. H., T. Craig, E. Craig, S. Postupalsky, C. T. LaRue, R. W. Nelson, D. W. Anderson, C. J. Henny, J. Watson, B. A. Millsap, J. W. Dawson, K. L. Cole, E. M. Martin, A. Margalida, and P. Kung (2009). Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor Research 43(3): 175–198.
, EHC; K. Titus, J. Shook, personal communication). Other nesting materials include human-made objects, like wire, parts of fence posts (495
Schmalzried, J. T. (1976). Nesting and food habits of the Golden Eagle on the Laramie Plains. M.S. thesis, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
), rarely, paper money and even, once, a steel muskrat trap (480
Ellis, D. H., T. Craig, E. Craig, S. Postupalsky, C. T. LaRue, R. W. Nelson, D. W. Anderson, C. J. Henny, J. Watson, B. A. Millsap, J. W. Dawson, K. L. Cole, E. M. Martin, A. Margalida, and P. Kung (2009). Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor Research 43(3): 175–198.
). These materials are usually woven into the existing nest structure (29
Palmer, R. S. (Editor) (1988). Diurnal raptors. In Handbook of North American Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. pp. 324–380.
).
Typically gathers softer materials, including lichens, mosses, and grasses, to form a bowl within the nest (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). The nest also may be lined with a wide variety of other vegetative materials, including shredded or dried yucca (Yuccaspp.) (507
Slevin, J. R. (1929). A contribution to our knowledge of the nesting habits of the Golden Eagle. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 18(3): 45–71.
, 311
Dixon, J. B. (1937). The Golden Eagle in San Diego County, California. Condor 39: 49–56.
), strips of inner bark, dead and green leaves, (508
Gabrielson, I. N., and F. C. Lincoln (1959). The Birds of Alaska. Stackpole Company, Harrisburg, PA, USA.
), and Douglas-fir and pine boughs (389
Jollie, M. T. (1943). The Golden Eagle-its life history, behavior, and ecology. M.S. thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
).
Dimensions
In its first year of use, a Golden Eagle nest is about a meter in diameter and less than a meter deep. After many years of reuse, each of which involves addition of nest material, a nest can be very large. A wide range of nest sizes is reported in the literature. A nest in southeastern Mongolia containing one eaglet was comprised of only a few scattered sticks on an exposed basalt ledge (480
Ellis, D. H., T. Craig, E. Craig, S. Postupalsky, C. T. LaRue, R. W. Nelson, D. W. Anderson, C. J. Henny, J. Watson, B. A. Millsap, J. W. Dawson, K. L. Cole, E. M. Martin, A. Margalida, and P. Kung (2009). Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor Research 43(3): 175–198.
). A tree nest in Scotland was estimated to be 5.2 m tall (105
Brown, L. (1976). Eagles of the World. Purnell, Cape Town, South Africa.
) and a nest in northern British Columbia, ~6.1 m tall (73
Bent, A. C. (1937). Life histories of North American birds of prey, Part 1. U.S. National Museum Bulletin no. 167.
). In western Washington, 6 tree nests were 0.9 m deep and 1.2–1.5 m in diameter (215
Anderson, R. J., and A. M. Bruce (1980). A comparison of selected Bald and Golden eagle nests in western Washington. In Proceedings of the Washington Bald Eagle Symposium (R. L. Knight, G. T. Allen, M. V. Stalmaster, and C. W. Servheen, Editors), Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA., USA. pp. 117–120.
). A nest near Rock Springs, Wyoming was 6.0 m tall, and a nest in Sun River, Montana, was 7.0 m tall and 2.6 m wide (509
Ellis, D. H. (1986). Extremely tall eagle nests. National Geographic Research 2: 517–519.
, 480
Ellis, D. H., T. Craig, E. Craig, S. Postupalsky, C. T. LaRue, R. W. Nelson, D. W. Anderson, C. J. Henny, J. Watson, B. A. Millsap, J. W. Dawson, K. L. Cole, E. M. Martin, A. Margalida, and P. Kung (2009). Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor Research 43(3): 175–198.
). Nests in Arizona (n = 12) measured 1.8 m long (range 1.2–2.6 m), 1.2 m wide (range 0.8–2.0 m), and 0.7 m high (range 0.1–2.0 m; 510
Grubb, T. G., and W. L. Eakle (1987). Comparative morphology of Bald and Golden eagle nests in Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management 51:744–748.
); the lined portions of 8 of the 12 nests were 0.9 m long (range 0.5–1.9 m) and 0.8 m wide (range 0.4–1.6 m); sticks used to build the 12 nests averaged 58 cm long (range 8–178 cm), 1 cm in diameter (range 0.4–5 cm), and 64 g in mass (range 5–820 g; 510
Grubb, T. G., and W. L. Eakle (1987). Comparative morphology of Bald and Golden eagle nests in Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management 51:744–748.
). Two nests in southeastern Mongolia contained sticks of up to 276 cm in length and 6.8 cm in diameter (480
Ellis, D. H., T. Craig, E. Craig, S. Postupalsky, C. T. LaRue, R. W. Nelson, D. W. Anderson, C. J. Henny, J. Watson, B. A. Millsap, J. W. Dawson, K. L. Cole, E. M. Martin, A. Margalida, and P. Kung (2009). Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor Research 43(3): 175–198.
).
Microclimate and Nest Exposure
Certain exposures may protect nests from prevailing inclement weather (486
Watson, J., and R. H. Dennis (1992). Nest-site selection by Golden Eagles in Scotland. British Birds 85: 469–481.
, 211
Morneau, F., S. Brodeur, R. Décarie, S. Carrière, and D. M. Bird (1994). Abundance and distribution of nesting Golden Eagles in Hudson Bay, Quebec. Journal of Raptor Research 28: 220–225.
), minimize intense (direct) sunlight that puts nestlings at risk of overheating (478
Mosher, J. A., and C. M. White (1976). Directional exposure of Golden Eagle nests. Canadian Field-Naturalist 90: 356–359.
, 486
Watson, J., and R. H. Dennis (1992). Nest-site selection by Golden Eagles in Scotland. British Birds 85: 469–481.
, 479
Kochert, M. N., K. Steenhof, and J. L. Brown (2019). Effects of nest exposure and spring temperatures on Golden Eagle brood survival: An opportunity for mitigation. Journal of Raptor Research 53: 91–97.
), reduce exposure to cold (478
Mosher, J. A., and C. M. White (1976). Directional exposure of Golden Eagle nests. Canadian Field-Naturalist 90: 356–359.
, 134
Poole, K. G., and R. G. Bromley (1988a). Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2275–2282.
), avoid prevailing winds (501
MacLaren, P. A., S. H. Anderson, and D. E. Runde (1988). Food habits and nest characteristics of breeding raptors in southwestern Wyoming. Great Basin Naturalist 48: 548–553.
, 134
Poole, K. G., and R. G. Bromley (1988a). Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2275–2282.
, 511
Craig, T., and E. H. Craig (2016). Changes in diurnal cliff-nesting raptor occurrence on the Ungalik River in Western Alaska: 1977, 1979, and 2008. Arctic 69: 225–230.
), or minimize exposure to down-drafts but provide exposure to updrafts that provide flight subsidy (483
Eaton, R. L. (1976). Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos). In Marine Shoreline Fauna of Washington (J. D. Brittell, J. M. Brown, and R. L. Eaton, Editors). Coastal Zone Environmental Study Report no. 3. Washington State Department of Game Ecology, Olympia, WA, USA. pp. 82–118.
).
At northern latitudes, may select south-facing cliffs for nesting because they are the only cliffs free of snow when territories are first occupied in spring (499
Amaral, M., and C. Gardner (1986). A survey for cliff-nesting birds of prey along the Noatak River, Alaska. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Endangered Species, Anchorage, AK, USA.
). In these areas, snow accumulated over the long winter may remain on nests on north-facing cliffs much longer than those on south-facing slopes (CLM).
Alternatively, selection for south-facing cliffs may be a strategy to minimize exposure of incubating eagles to cold (478
Mosher, J. A., and C. M. White (1976). Directional exposure of Golden Eagle nests. Canadian Field-Naturalist 90: 356–359.
, 134
Poole, K. G., and R. G. Bromley (1988a). Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2275–2282.
). Early in nesting season, south-facing nests across much of the Subarctic and Arctic benefit from direct and reflected radiation, while also being in the lee of prevailing northerly winds (134
Poole, K. G., and R. G. Bromley (1988a). Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2275–2282.
, CLM). However, nestlings in nests on south-facing cliffs that do not have adequate shade may be exposed to high temperatures during the brood-rearing period (390
Gordon, S. (1955). The Golden Eagle; King of Birds. Citadel Press, New York, NY, USA.
, 134
Poole, K. G., and R. G. Bromley (1988a). Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2275–2282.
). As a consequence, parent eagles may spend more time brooding or shading to protect young from overheating in unshaded south-facing nests (478
Mosher, J. A., and C. M. White (1976). Directional exposure of Golden Eagle nests. Canadian Field-Naturalist 90: 356–359.
). Thus, there may be a trade-off for eagles between the thermal benefit of using south-facing cliffs in late winter and spring and the cost to those eagles, which then must spend more time brooding and being shaded during the peak of the Arctic and Subarctic summer.
In temperate areas, eagles may select nest sites that avoid direct sunlight, presumably to protect nestlings from overheating and to decrease brooding time required of adults (478
Mosher, J. A., and C. M. White (1976). Directional exposure of Golden Eagle nests. Canadian Field-Naturalist 90: 356–359.
, 479
Kochert, M. N., K. Steenhof, and J. L. Brown (2019). Effects of nest exposure and spring temperatures on Golden Eagle brood survival: An opportunity for mitigation. Journal of Raptor Research 53: 91–97.
). No nest measured in Boulder County, Colorado was in direct sunlight for > 2–4 h/d (389
Jollie, M. T. (1943). The Golden Eagle-its life history, behavior, and ecology. M.S. thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
), and 33% of nests in southwestern Montana had exposures that provided shade from hot afternoon sun (366
McGahan, J. (1968). Ecology of the Golden Eagle. Auk 85: 1–12.
). Of 399 nests measured in the Snake River Canyon, Idaho, 69% were classified as shaded (> 25% afternoon shading) and 39% were exposed (< 5% afternoon shading) (479
Kochert, M. N., K. Steenhof, and J. L. Brown (2019). Effects of nest exposure and spring temperatures on Golden Eagle brood survival: An opportunity for mitigation. Journal of Raptor Research 53: 91–97.
). Significantly more breeding attempts occurred in shaded nests. However, in 37 territories with both shaded and exposed nests, eagles showed no clear preference for shaded (500 attempts) or exposed nests (430 exposed attempts; USGS, unpublished data).
Nest orientation varies extensively across the range of eagles. However, some of the differences reported among study areas may represent variation in survey methods rather than in eagle preference (CLM). In northern breeding areas (> 60°N latitude), more eagle nests are found on south-facing cliffs. Of 963 studied nesting cliffs, 53% were south-facing, 17% north-facing, 16% west-facing, and 13% east-facing (Alaska, n = 585; [212
Ritchie, R. J., and J. A. Curatolo (1982). Notes on Golden Eagle productivity and nest site characteristics, Porcupine River, Alaska, 1979–1982. Raptor Research 16: 123–127.
, 512
Kozie, K. D., R. J. Steidl, C. McIntyre, and G. Dodge (1993). Surveys and reproductive success of cliff nesting raptors in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park, 1993. WRST Research and Resource Management Report, No. 93-4. National Park Service, Copper Center, AK, USA.
; NPS, unpublished data], Yukon Territory, n = 337 [513
Hayes, R., D. Mossop, and N. Barichello (1980). Birds of prey inventory project, the Nahoni Raptor Inventory. In 1980 Annual Report, Inventory, Population Studies, and Management Projects, Birds of Prey (D. Mossop and R. Hayes, Editors). Yukon Department of Renewable Resources, Whitehorse, YT, Canada.
, 514
Yukon Department of Renewable Resources (1982). Inventory, population studies, and management projects, birds of prey, 1982 annual report. Yukon Department of Renewable Resources, Whitehorse, YT, Canada.
], and Nunavut, n = 41; 134
Poole, K. G., and R. G. Bromley (1988a). Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2275–2282.
]). However, aspects of nest cliffs vary among these northern study areas. For example, 49% of monitored nest cliffs in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska were south-facing, 27% north-facing, 13% west-facing, and 12% east-facing (NPS, unpublished data). Further, nests near Norton Bay in western Alaska are more likely to face east, away from prevailing coastal storms (511
Craig, T., and E. H. Craig (2016). Changes in diurnal cliff-nesting raptor occurrence on the Ungalik River in Western Alaska: 1977, 1979, and 2008. Arctic 69: 225–230.
). Pairs farther south are less likely to construct nests on south-facing sites. Of 423 nests in Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, and Nevada, 37% were on south-facing cliffs, 22% were on north-facing cliffs, 21% were on east-facing cliffs, and 20% were on west-facing cliffs (345
Hickman, G. L. (1968). The ecology and breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho and southeastern Oregon. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washington, DC, USA.
, 366
McGahan, J. (1968). Ecology of the Golden Eagle. Auk 85: 1–12.
, 201
Baglien, J. W. (1975). Biology and habitat requirements of the nesting Golden Eagle in southwestern Montana. M.S. thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
, 485
Seibert, D. J., R. J. Oakleaf, J. M. Laughlin, and J. L. Page (1976). Nesting ecology of Golden Eagles in Elko County, Nevada. U.S. Department of the Initerior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, CO, USA.
, 495
Schmalzried, J. T. (1976). Nesting and food habits of the Golden Eagle on the Laramie Plains. M.S. thesis, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
; USGS, unpublished data). Nest orientations also can differ within study areas, with more southwest-facing nests at higher elevations (202
Craig, T. H., and E. H. Craig (1984b). Results of a helicopter survey of cliff nesting raptors in a deep canyon in southern Idaho. Raptor Research 18: 20–25.
). In many study areas, eagles nest on cliffs with all exposures (366
McGahan, J. (1968). Ecology of the Golden Eagle. Auk 85: 1–12.
, 376
Lockhart, J. M. (1976). The food habits, status and ecology of nesting Golden Eagles in the Trans-Pecos region of Texas. M.S. thesis, Sul Ross State University, Alpine, TX, USA.
, 485
Seibert, D. J., R. J. Oakleaf, J. M. Laughlin, and J. L. Page (1976). Nesting ecology of Golden Eagles in Elko County, Nevada. U.S. Department of the Initerior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, CO, USA.
).
A number of other factors also influence nest exposure, one of the most prominent being the presence of overhang. Overhangs protect nests from sun, rain, snow, and ice formation (199
Kochert, M. N. (1972). Population status and chemical contamination in Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
, 134
Poole, K. G., and R. G. Bromley (1988a). Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2275–2282.
), but falling rocks or soil from overhangs can kill incubating or brooding eagles or nestlings (500
Phillips, R. L., A. H. Wheeler, J. M. Lockhart, T. P. McEneaney, and N. C. Forrester (1990). Nesting ecology of Golden Eagles and other raptors in southeastern Montana and northern Wyoming. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.
). Sixteen of 30 nests (53%) in eastern Hudson Bay and 107 of 337 nests (32%) in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska had overhangs (211
Morneau, F., S. Brodeur, R. Décarie, S. Carrière, and D. M. Bird (1994). Abundance and distribution of nesting Golden Eagles in Hudson Bay, Quebec. Journal of Raptor Research 28: 220–225.
, CLM). Ten of those in Denali were built in small caves or large potholes in cliffs. Percent of nest covered by overhangs averaged 38% at 41 nests in the central Canadian Arctic compared to only 4% at 7 nests in northern Utah (134
Poole, K. G., and R. G. Bromley (1988a). Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2275–2282.
, 205
Peterson, D. L. (1988a). Nesting and habitat parameters for selected raptors in the desert of northern Utah. M.S. thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
).
Maintenance or Reuse of Nests, Alternate Nests
An alternative nest is one of potentially several nests within a nesting territory that is not being used for laying eggs in the current or given year (433
Millsap, B. A., T. G. Grubb, R. K. Murphy, T. Swem, and J. W. Watson (2015). Conservation significance of alternative nests of Golden Eagles. Global Ecology and Conservation 3: 234–241.
, 515
Steenhof, K., M. N. Kochert, C. L. McIntyre, and J. L. Brown (2017). Coming to terms about describing Golden Eagle reproduction. Journal of Raptor Research 51(3): 378–390
). Alternative nests are a common and important feature of nesting territories across the species’ range (390
Gordon, S. (1955). The Golden Eagle; King of Birds. Citadel Press, New York, NY, USA.
, 2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
, 502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
, 433
Millsap, B. A., T. G. Grubb, R. K. Murphy, T. Swem, and J. W. Watson (2015). Conservation significance of alternative nests of Golden Eagles. Global Ecology and Conservation 3: 234–241.
). Core use areas (50% utilization distributions) within home ranges of territory holders typically include all known alternative nests (407
Watson, J. W., A. A. Duff, and R. W. Davies (2014). Home range and resource selection by GPS-monitored adult Golden Eagles in the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion: Implications for wind power development. Journal of Wildlife Management 78: 1012–1021.
, 433
Millsap, B. A., T. G. Grubb, R. K. Murphy, T. Swem, and J. W. Watson (2015). Conservation significance of alternative nests of Golden Eagles. Global Ecology and Conservation 3: 234–241.
).
The number of alternative nests within a Golden Eagle territory varies greatly within and among study areas. Eagles used between 1 and 18 nests per territory in the Snake River Canyon (mean = 7, SD = 4) and have used > 1 nest in 61 of 62 cliff nesting territories (502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
). In nearly half of territories, these birds use between 5 and 8 nests. In eastern Oregon and western Washington, 14 territories contained 38 alternative nests (mean = 3), plus 14 used nests (407
Watson, J. W., A. A. Duff, and R. W. Davies (2014). Home range and resource selection by GPS-monitored adult Golden Eagles in the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion: Implications for wind power development. Journal of Wildlife Management 78: 1012–1021.
). Golden Eagle nesting territories in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska (n = 111), averaged 2 alternative nests (range 0–7). Most nests were within 100 m of the occupied nest (CLM). All but one of the 111 territories had alternative nests (CLM). The number of nests per territory in northeastern Quebec averaged 3 (range 1–8, n = 20 territories; 476
Morneau, F., B. Gagnon, S. Poliquin, P. Lamothe, N. D'Astous, and J. A. Tremblay (2012). Breeding status and population trends of Golden Eagles in northeastern Québec, Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology 7(2): 4.
). In a 2-year study in Utah, 11 of 21 pairs had > 1 nest (472
Camenzind, F. J. (1969). Nesting ecology and behavior of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos L. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series 10(4):4–15, 35–36.
), and in a 5-year study in Montana, 20 of 36 pairs had alternative nests (366
McGahan, J. (1968). Ecology of the Golden Eagle. Auk 85: 1–12.
).
Alternative nests within a territory can be separated by < 1 m or > 6 km (366
McGahan, J. (1968). Ecology of the Golden Eagle. Auk 85: 1–12.
). The number of nests and the distances between them may be related to terrain features and proximity of other nesting pairs (268
Boeker, E. L., and T. D. Ray (1971). Golden Eagle population studies in the Southwest. Condor 73: 463–467.
). In southwestern Idaho, mean distance between nearest alternative nests average 191 m (range: < 1 to 1,822 m) (502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
). In central Utah, mean distance averages 513 m (range: < 1 to 12,665 m) (516
Slater, S. J., K. R. Keller, and R. N. Knight (2017). Interannual Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) nest-use patterns in central Utah: Implications for long-term nest protection. Journal of Raptor Research 51(2): 129–135.
). Telemetered eagles in three territories in eastern Oregon and western Washington used cliff nests 1 to 3 km apart (407
Watson, J. W., A. A. Duff, and R. W. Davies (2014). Home range and resource selection by GPS-monitored adult Golden Eagles in the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion: Implications for wind power development. Journal of Wildlife Management 78: 1012–1021.
). Most of the alternative nests were in high-use areas of eagle home ranges (407
Watson, J. W., A. A. Duff, and R. W. Davies (2014). Home range and resource selection by GPS-monitored adult Golden Eagles in the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion: Implications for wind power development. Journal of Wildlife Management 78: 1012–1021.
). At a single territory in southwestern Montana, in different years a tracked eagle occupied nests 4 km apart (R. Crandall, unpublished data). An eagle pair in southwestern Idaho laid a replacement clutch in a nest 436 m from the nest where the first clutch failed (USGS, unpublished data.).
It appears that not all alternative nests are used for egg-laying (but most studies are too short in duration to confirm this). Number of nests in a territory that were used for egg laying varies from a mean of 3 (range 1–8) in central Utah (25–38 years; 516
Slater, S. J., K. R. Keller, and R. N. Knight (2017). Interannual Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) nest-use patterns in central Utah: Implications for long-term nest protection. Journal of Raptor Research 51(2): 129–135.
) to 7 (range 1–18) in southwestern Idaho (46 years; 502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
).
Once an alternative nest has been used, Golden Eagles often re-use it (433
Millsap, B. A., T. G. Grubb, R. K. Murphy, T. Swem, and J. W. Watson (2015). Conservation significance of alternative nests of Golden Eagles. Global Ecology and Conservation 3: 234–241.
). Mean times between re-use of individual nests vary between 3 years (range 1–24 years) in central Utah (516
Slater, S. J., K. R. Keller, and R. N. Knight (2017). Interannual Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) nest-use patterns in central Utah: Implications for long-term nest protection. Journal of Raptor Research 51(2): 129–135.
) to 4 years (range 1–39 years, n = 1,250 nestings) in southwestern Idaho (502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
). Some pairs use the same nest repeatedly, constantly repairing and adding material to alternative nests (366
McGahan, J. (1968). Ecology of the Golden Eagle. Auk 85: 1–12.
, 268
Boeker, E. L., and T. D. Ray (1971). Golden Eagle population studies in the Southwest. Condor 73: 463–467.
, 502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
).
Re-use of nests is not associated with nest success in the previous year (268
Boeker, E. L., and T. D. Ray (1971). Golden Eagle population studies in the Southwest. Condor 73: 463–467.
, 502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
, 516
Slater, S. J., K. R. Keller, and R. N. Knight (2017). Interannual Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) nest-use patterns in central Utah: Implications for long-term nest protection. Journal of Raptor Research 51(2): 129–135.
). From 1966–2011, Golden Eagles at 66 territories in southwestern Idaho used each of 454 individual nests from 1 to 26 times (mean = 4 uses; 502
Kochert, M. N., and K. Steenhof (2012). Frequency of nest use by Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 239–247.
). Most of those nests (75%) were used < 4 times and 36% were used only once. During a 5-year study in southwestern Montana, Golden Eagles used 10 of 28 tree nests once, 6 nests were used twice, 7 nests were used 3 times, and 5 nests were used 4 times (482
Crandall, R. H., D. J. Craighead, and B. E. Bedrosian (2016). A comparison of nest survival between cliff- and tree-nesting Golden Eagles. Journal of Raptor Research 50(3): 295–300.
). No nest was used all 5 years of the study. Golden Eagles in that area used 9 of 32 cliff nests once, 9 nests were used twice, 5 nests were used 3 times, 3 nests were used 4 times, and 6 nests were used all 5 years of the study (482
Crandall, R. H., D. J. Craighead, and B. E. Bedrosian (2016). A comparison of nest survival between cliff- and tree-nesting Golden Eagles. Journal of Raptor Research 50(3): 295–300.
).
Eggs
Shape
Short-ovate to ovate or rarely elliptical-oval (73
Bent, A. C. (1937). Life histories of North American birds of prey, Part 1. U.S. National Museum Bulletin no. 167.
).
Size
Length of 59 eggs from North America averaged 74.5 mm (range 67.5–85.7), and width averaged 58.0 mm (range 49.4–64.3) (73
Bent, A. C. (1937). Life histories of North American birds of prey, Part 1. U.S. National Museum Bulletin no. 167.
); another egg measured 89.0 × 66.6 mm (C.S. Sharp in 73
Bent, A. C. (1937). Life histories of North American birds of prey, Part 1. U.S. National Museum Bulletin no. 167.
). In another study of 20 clutches, eggs averaged 74.4 mm ± 3.4 SD × 57.3 mm ± 1.63 SD (29
Palmer, R. S. (Editor) (1988). Diurnal raptors. In Handbook of North American Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. pp. 324–380.
). Eggs from Scotland were similar in dimensions to North American eggs, averaging 75 × 59 mm (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
, no sample size given). Eggs from central Asia are reported to be 70-80 mm in length and 56 - 64 mm in diameter (84
Gavrin, V. F., I. A. Dolguschin, M. N. Korelov, and M. A. Kuzhmina (1962). Birds of Kazakhstan. Volume 2. Alma Ata, Kazakhstan. [English translation for ICBP Bustard Group].
). Finally, a more recent study of > 1,000 species of birds, included measurements of 391 Golden Eagle eggs (517
Stoddard, M. C., E. H. Yong, D. Akkaynak, C. Sheard, J. A. Tobias, and L. Mahadevan (2017). Avian egg shape: Form, function, and evolution. Science 356: 1249–1254.
). Of these, average length was 77.3 mm, asymmetry was 0.1192, and ellipticity was 0.3058 (see Stoddard et al. [517
Stoddard, M. C., E. H. Yong, D. Akkaynak, C. Sheard, J. A. Tobias, and L. Mahadevan (2017). Avian egg shape: Form, function, and evolution. Science 356: 1249–1254.
] for definition of these terms).
Mass
Weight of 30 eggs from southern California averaged 141 g (range 114–177 g; 518
Hanna, W. C. (1930). Notes on the Golden Eagle in southern California. Condor 32: 121–123.
). Mean empty weight of 1,083 eggs from North America was 13 g (range 11–14 g; 358
Reynolds, H. V., III (1969). Population status of the Golden Eagle in south-central Montana. M.S. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
, 519
Anderson, D. W., and J. J. Hickey (1972). Eggshell changes in certain North American birds. In Proceedings of the XVth International Ornitholological Congress (K. H. Voous, Editor). E. J. Brill, Leiden, Netherlands. pp. 514–540.
, 199
Kochert, M. N. (1972). Population status and chemical contamination in Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
). Average weight of newly laid eggs from Scotland was 145 g (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
, no sample size given).
Eggshell Thickness
Thickness of shells of eggs collected pre-1947 in North America differed little from those collected after that period, when DDT influenced thickness of eggshells of other species (519
Anderson, D. W., and J. J. Hickey (1972). Eggshell changes in certain North American birds. In Proceedings of the XVth International Ornitholological Congress (K. H. Voous, Editor). E. J. Brill, Leiden, Netherlands. pp. 514–540.
, 199
Kochert, M. N. (1972). Population status and chemical contamination in Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
). Shell thickness of pre-1947 clutches from western North America averaged 0.583 mm ± 0.003 SD (n = 290). Shell thickness of eggs collected during the 1960s and 1970s (358
Reynolds, H. V., III (1969). Population status of the Golden Eagle in south-central Montana. M.S. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
, 418
Beecham, J. J., Jr. (1970). Nesting ecology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
, 519
Anderson, D. W., and J. J. Hickey (1972). Eggshell changes in certain North American birds. In Proceedings of the XVth International Ornitholological Congress (K. H. Voous, Editor). E. J. Brill, Leiden, Netherlands. pp. 514–540.
, 199
Kochert, M. N. (1972). Population status and chemical contamination in Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
) averaged 0.59 mm for Idaho (n = 51), 0.64 mm for Montana (n = 7), 0.58 mm for Alaska (n = 4), 0.61 mm for California (n = 9), and 0.62 mm for Utah (n = 17). One hypothesis for a lack of difference is that the diet in North America is dominated by mammals (see Diet and Foraging: Diet) and, as a consequence, there is little opportunity for biomagnification of organochlorine pesticides that thinned the eggs of other species (519
Anderson, D. W., and J. J. Hickey (1972). Eggshell changes in certain North American birds. In Proceedings of the XVth International Ornitholological Congress (K. H. Voous, Editor). E. J. Brill, Leiden, Netherlands. pp. 514–540.
, 199
Kochert, M. N. (1972). Population status and chemical contamination in Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
). In contrast, dieldrin in sheep dips has been implicated in affecting thickness of Golden Eagle eggs in west Scotland (520
Lockie, J. D., D. A. Ratcliffe, and R. Balherry (1969). Breeding success and organochlorine residues in Golden Eagles in west Scotland. Journal of Applied Ecology 6: 381–389.
, 521
Ratcliffe, D. A. (1970). Changes attributable to pesticides in breakage frequency and eggshell thickness in some British birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 7: 67–115.
).
We know of no measurements of eggshell thickness for Golden Eagles in Canada or the northeastern United States. Despite this, reduction is eggshell thickness is suspected in causing population declines of the Golden Eagle population in eastern North America that regularly fed on avian piscivores (195
Todd, C. S. (2000). Golden Eagle Assessment. Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Augusta, ME, USA.
).
Color
Base color varies from white to “cream-buff” or pinkish white (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
, 73
Bent, A. C. (1937). Life histories of North American birds of prey, Part 1. U.S. National Museum Bulletin no. 167.
). Usually eggs are marked with evenly spaced small blotches, spots, or fine dots that are unevenly distributed or concentrated at one end. Some are evenly sprinkled throughout with small dots. Colors of markings are various shades of browns. Some eggs have large blotches overlaid with browns (73
Bent, A. C. (1937). Life histories of North American birds of prey, Part 1. U.S. National Museum Bulletin no. 167.
). The reason for differences in color patterns and degree of pigmentation are unknown, but in Scotland egg coloration may vary regionally, by nest substrate (trees vs. cliffs), or even between eggs within a clutch, with the first egg more heavily pigmented (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
).
Surface Texture
Surface texture is similar to that of a chicken egg.
Clutch Size
Typically 1–3 eggs and rarely 4 eggs (522
Degroot, D. S. (1928). Record sets of eggs of California raptores [sic]. Condor 30: 360–361.
, 523
Ray, M. S. (1928). A record set of eggs of the Golden Eagle. Condor 30: 250.
, 390
Gordon, S. (1955). The Golden Eagle; King of Birds. Citadel Press, New York, NY, USA.
, 2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). DeGroot (522
Degroot, D. S. (1928). Record sets of eggs of California raptores [sic]. Condor 30: 360–361.
) reported on a nest in California that contained 5 eggs, but concluded that 1 egg was laid much earlier than the others, perhaps in the prior year. It is not known whether age affects clutch size.
The number of eggs in 332 clutches from eight studies in five western states averaged 2 (northern California, n = 21 nests; northern Colorado, n = 52; central Utah, n = 49; southwestern Idaho, n = 160; southwestern Montana, n = 50). Of these nests, 14% contained 1 egg, 76% contained 2 eggs, and 10% contained 3 eggs (507
Slevin, J. R. (1929). A contribution to our knowledge of the nesting habits of the Golden Eagle. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 18(3): 45–71.
, 389
Jollie, M. T. (1943). The Golden Eagle-its life history, behavior, and ecology. M.S. thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
, 472
Camenzind, F. J. (1969). Nesting ecology and behavior of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos L. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series 10(4):4–15, 35–36.
, 358
Reynolds, H. V., III (1969). Population status of the Golden Eagle in south-central Montana. M.S. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
, 346
Arnell, W. B. (1971). Prey utilization by nesting Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in central Utah. M.S. thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
, 203
Olendorff, R. R. (1973). The ecology of the nesting birds of prey of northeastern Colorado. U.S. International Biological Program, Grassland Biome Technical Report 211. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
; USGS, unpublished data). In southwestern Idaho, clutches with 3 eggs are more common in years when prey is abundant (USGS, unpublished data). Clutch size in southwestern Idaho is not related to laying date (n = 115; USGS, unpublished data).
Egg-Laying
In captivity, most eggs are laid at intervals of 3 to 4 days (mean 3.5 days, n = 35) (387
Kish, F. (1970). Egg laying and incubation by American Golden Eagles, Aquila chrysaetos canadensis, at Topeka Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook 10: 26–29.
, 415
Kish, F. (1972). First breeding by American Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos canadensis at Topeka Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook 12: 136–138.
, 524
Hamerstrom, F. (1971). Breeding Project Information Exchange no. 22 (Golden Eagles). Raptor Research News 5: 23–24.
, 525
Grier, J. W. (1973b). Techniques and results of artificial insemination with Golden Eagles. Raptor Research 7: 1–12.
). However, Grier (525
Grier, J. W. (1973b). Techniques and results of artificial insemination with Golden Eagles. Raptor Research 7: 1–12.
) reported two cases of captive birds with intervals of 7 and 10 days between the second and third eggs, possibly due to handling of the females during insemination. Laying intervals in the wild range from 3 to 5 days (n = 4) (390
Gordon, S. (1955). The Golden Eagle; King of Birds. Citadel Press, New York, NY, USA.
, 444
Aoyama, I., F. Sekiyama, N. Obara, T. Tamura, and H. Sakaguchi (1988). Breeding biology of a pair of Golden Eagles in the Kitakami Mountains. Aquila Chrysaetos 6: 14–23.
).
Golden Eagle rarely re-nests when the first clutch is destroyed (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). Re-nesting occurred in only 2 of 384 nesting attempts in southwestern Idaho (USGS, unpublished data). Replacement clutches were suspected in 2 of over 200 nesting attempts in Scotland (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). Replacement clutches generally are laid 19 to 30 days after failure of the first clutch (mean 24 days, n = 13; 311
Dixon, J. B. (1937). The Golden Eagle in San Diego County, California. Condor 39: 49–56.
(California), 472
Camenzind, F. J. (1969). Nesting ecology and behavior of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos L. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series 10(4):4–15, 35–36.
(Utah), 526
Morrison, M. L., and B. J. Walton (1980). Laying of replacement clutches by Falconiforms and Strigiforms in North America. Raptor Research 14: 79–85.
(North America), 440
Dennis, R. (1983). Probable polygyny by Golden Eagle. British Birds 76: 310–311.
(United Kingdom).
Incubation
Onset of Broodiness and Incubation in Relation to Laying
Incubation begins with the first egg, leading to asynchronous hatching (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). The female settles into incubation posture on the nest before the first egg is laid (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
).
Incubation Patch
Present on both sexes but more developed and conspicuous on females (R. Jackman, personal communication).
Incubation Period
The estimated incubation period averages 42 days (range 41–45, n = 11 clutches; 527
Abbott, C. G. (1924). Period of incubation of the Golden Eagle. Condor 26: 194.
, 390
Gordon, S. (1955). The Golden Eagle; King of Birds. Citadel Press, New York, NY, USA.
, 528
Mitchell, G. A. (1968a). A Golden Eagle nest in the pine ridge. Nebraska Bird Review 36: 33–35.
, 472
Camenzind, F. J. (1969). Nesting ecology and behavior of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos L. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series 10(4):4–15, 35–36.
, 358
Reynolds, H. V., III (1969). Population status of the Golden Eagle in south-central Montana. M.S. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
, 418
Beecham, J. J., Jr. (1970). Nesting ecology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
, 444
Aoyama, I., F. Sekiyama, N. Obara, T. Tamura, and H. Sakaguchi (1988). Breeding biology of a pair of Golden Eagles in the Kitakami Mountains. Aquila Chrysaetos 6: 14–23.
, 2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
).
Parental Behavior
In southwestern Idaho, females did all nocturnal incubation and 83% of diurnal incubation (n = 11 nesting attempts; 249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
). In that study, males relieved incubating females 2 times (± 0.1 SD) per day, and male incubation bouts averaged 49 min (± 5 SD). Seventeen of 111 male-initiated change-overs involved food transfers to the female on or near the nest. It has been suggested that inattentiveness by the male may force the female off eggs to forage and ultimately abandon the nesting effort (249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
).
Hardiness of Eggs Against Temperature Stress; Effect of Egg Neglect
Eggs can tolerate some degree of cooling, but the precise amount is unknown. At least 1 egg in a clutch of 2 eggs in southwestern Idaho hatched after being exposed to snowy and cold conditions (0° C) for 1–5 hr during late incubation (MNK).
Hatching
Hatching of eggs is asynchronous (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). The hatching interval between the first and second eggs was, in a single case, 96.5 hours (444
Aoyama, I., F. Sekiyama, N. Obara, T. Tamura, and H. Sakaguchi (1988). Breeding biology of a pair of Golden Eagles in the Kitakami Mountains. Aquila Chrysaetos 6: 14–23.
).
Detailed observations of the hatching process at a single nest in western Montana suggested that eagles in eggs may begin vocalizing 2–3 days before hatching (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
). Activity of the hatchling increases after the egg is pipped (when a small hole is opened in the eggshell), and the process from pipping to hatching can take ~1.5 days. At one nest, the adult female appeared to assist hatching by pulling on the egg; whether this was purposely meant to aid the eaglet in breaking out of the egg is unknown (388
Ellis, D. H., and N. J. Schmitt (2017). Behavior of the Golden Eagle: An Illustrated Ethogram. Hancock House Publishers, Blaine, Washington, USA.
).
Young Birds
Condition at Hatching
Newly hatched young are altricial, weak, and only capable of limited locomotion. They must be fed by a parent for many days after hatching.
When they hatch, young are covered with short grayish-white “pre-pennae” down (32
Brown, L. H., and D. Amadon (1968). Eagles, Hawks, and Falcons of the World. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.
). Their ear holes are open, the beak is black, the egg tooth is prominent, their feet and legs are pale pinkish, and their talons are white to pinkish (392
Sumner, E. L., Jr. (1929c). Notes on the growth and behavior of young Golden Eagles. Auk 46: 161–169.
, 77
Sumner, E. L., Jr. (1929). Comparative studies in the growth of young raptors. Condor 31: 85–111.
, MNK). Their eyes are partially open, but may not be able to detect movement (392
Sumner, E. L., Jr. (1929c). Notes on the growth and behavior of young Golden Eagles. Auk 46: 161–169.
, 77
Sumner, E. L., Jr. (1929). Comparative studies in the growth of young raptors. Condor 31: 85–111.
). Newly hatched young are damp when they emerge from the egg, but down dries within 2 hours of hatching (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). Within a day of hatching, young average 110 g (range 105–115, n = 7) (392
Sumner, E. L., Jr. (1929c). Notes on the growth and behavior of young Golden Eagles. Auk 46: 161–169.
, 77
Sumner, E. L., Jr. (1929). Comparative studies in the growth of young raptors. Condor 31: 85–111.
, 529
Ellis, D. H. (1973b). Behavior of the Golden Eagle: an ontogenic study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
).
Growth and Development
Increases in mass of Golden Eagle nestlings follow a general sigmoid growth pattern (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
, 379
Collopy, M. W. (1986). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 98: 445–458.
). Mass at hatching is about 100 g and increases to about 500 g at 10 d. From then growth is linear until about 40–45 days, at which point growth slows down. Nestlings attain maximum body mass at approximately 50 – 60 days after hatching (379
Collopy, M. W. (1986). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 98: 445–458.
). Female nestlings have slower growth rates but significantly higher maximum body mass (mean 3,803 g; n = 102) than do males (mean 3,233; n = 85) (378
Collopy, M. W. (1980). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
, 379
Collopy, M. W. (1986). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 98: 445–458.
).
Growth rate of feathers in the alar, caudal, humeral, spinal, ventral, capital, crural, and femoral feather tracts is linear with no apparent difference between sexes (n = 3 [78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
]; n = 23 [378
Collopy, M. W. (1980). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
]). Feathers in the alar and caudal tracts continue to grow to full length after fledging (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
). In southwestern Idaho, growth of the foot-pad is linear between 6 and 31 days with the foot reaching full size between 31 and 35 days (n = 23; 199
Kochert, M. N. (1972). Population status and chemical contamination in Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
). Mean foot-pad size differs significantly between male and female nestlings beginning at 21–25 days (199
Kochert, M. N. (1972). Population status and chemical contamination in Golden Eagles in southwestern Idaho. M.S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
).
For the first ~20 days after hatching, Golden Eagles depend on their parents to help regulate their body temperature (2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). Parents do this by brooding (sitting over the young) or shading (creating a shadow for the young). In extreme heat, young are prone to heat stress and death (479
Kochert, M. N., K. Steenhof, and J. L. Brown (2019). Effects of nest exposure and spring temperatures on Golden Eagle brood survival: An opportunity for mitigation. Journal of Raptor Research 53: 91–97.
). They respond to heat by moving to cool objects, to shaded portions of the nest, or by panting (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
). They also may droop or spread their wings, presumably to dissipate heat (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
).
Behavior
Conflicts between siblings occur frequently and occasionally result in siblicide, particularly when food is limited (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
, 530
Edwards, T. C., Jr., and M. W. Collopy (1983). Obligate and facultative brood reduction in eagles: an examination of factors that influence fratricide. Auk 100: 630–635.
, 2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
). The notion that only one of two nestlings ever survives (48
Wheeler, B. K. (2003). Raptors of Western North America. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
) is incorrect (but it is likely true for Bonelli’s Eagle [Aquila fasciata], Verreaux's Eagle [A. verreauxii], and other species of Aquila eagles; see Table 4 for details on brood sizes of Golden Eagles).
Aggressive interactions between siblings can occur throughout the nesting cycle. The larger, most aggressive nestling often receives the most food (378
Collopy, M. W. (1980). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
). The subordinate nestling is sometimes starved or forced from the nest (531
Sakaguchi, H., and K. Chiba (1988). Observations of sibling competition and the post-fledging return of a Golden Eaglet to the eyrie. Aquila Chrysaetos 6: 28–29.
). The probability of siblicide depends on sex and hatching sequence, with siblicide more than likely to occur when a female eagle hatches before a male (530
Edwards, T. C., Jr., and M. W. Collopy (1983). Obligate and facultative brood reduction in eagles: an examination of factors that influence fratricide. Auk 100: 630–635.
, 532
Bortolotti, G. (1989). Sex ratios of fledgling Golden Eagles. Auk 106: 520–521.
). Aggression occurred in all 7 nests with 2 young observed from blinds in southwestern Idaho, and it resulted in death in 3 of those 7 broods (378
Collopy, M. W. (1980). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
). In other studies, siblicide accounted for 7% of 41 nestling mortalities in southwestern Idaho (473
Beecham, J. J., and M. N. Kochert (1975). Breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho. Wilson Bulletin 87: 506–513.
) and 40% of 15 nestling losses in central Europe (533
Kropil, R., and M. Majda (1996). Causes of low productivity in the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos in the central West Carpathians. In Eagle Studies (B. U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor, Editors). World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls, Berlin, Germany. pp. 489–494.
).
Young generally exhibit non-aggressive social behavior after fledging but before independence (396
O'Toole, L. T., P. L. Kennedy, R. L. Knight, and L. C. McEwen (1999). Postfledging behavior of Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 111: 472–477.
). Fledglings mutually preen when perched together (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
), they catch and pluck prey together (396
O'Toole, L. T., P. L. Kennedy, R. L. Knight, and L. C. McEwen (1999). Postfledging behavior of Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 111: 472–477.
), occasionally grab at each other or their parents (388
Ellis, D. H., and N. J. Schmitt (2017). Behavior of the Golden Eagle: An Illustrated Ethogram. Hancock House Publishers, Blaine, Washington, USA.
), and they stoop, talon-touch, and talon grapple (255
Grant, J. R., and M. J. McGrady (1999). Dispersal of Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos in Scotland. Ringing and Migration 19: 169–174.
). Agonistic interactions between parents and offspring or between siblings are uncommon, except just before or after fledglings gain independence (398
Walker, D. G. (1987). Observations on the post-fledging period of the Golden Eagle, Aquila chrysaetos, in England. Ibis 129: 92–96.
, 534
Walker, D. G. (1988). The behaviour and movements of a juvenile Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos in England in 1986. Ibis 130: 564.
, 400
Bahat, O. (1992). Post-fledging movements of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos homeyeri) in the Negev Desert, Israel, as determined by radio-telemetry. In Wildlife Telemetry: Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals (I. G. Priede and S. M. Swift, Editors), Ellis Horwood Ltd., New York, NY, USA. pp. 612–621.
, 255
Grant, J. R., and M. J. McGrady (1999). Dispersal of Golden Eagles Aquila chrysaetos in Scotland. Ringing and Migration 19: 169–174.
, 396
O'Toole, L. T., P. L. Kennedy, R. L. Knight, and L. C. McEwen (1999). Postfledging behavior of Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 111: 472–477.
, 2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
).
Behavioral observations of eaglets at nests reported by Ellis (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
; n = 7) and Collopy (378
Collopy, M. W. (1980). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
; n = 12) suggest that during the first week after hatching, young spend > 95% of the day lying on their chest and belly. As they age, the proportion of time in this position decreases. They begin sitting at one day old and standing at 17–20. These studies report no sex-specific differences in development of locomotion in the nest. Wing-flapping, performed while sitting, is first seen at about 9–10 days old and, once the young grow older, they flap their wings while standing. Flapping increases in frequency from week five until fledging.
Observations to date suggest that the male almost never broods, and the female broods and shades young from hatching to about 45 days of age (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
, 249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
). At the early part of the nesting cycle, time spent brooding appears related to severity of wind (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
). Percentage of the day brooding or shading decreases linearly from > 80% at 1–10 days of age to < 5% at 40 days (249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
). The female broods young nightly until 17–42 days after hatching (mean = 29 days) and roosts on the nest until 17–54 days after hatching (mean = 40 days; 249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
).
Feeding
In two observational studies, both parents brought prey to the nest, but the male rarely fed young directly (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
, 249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
). Adults did not always feed nestlings on the day that they hatch. Mean number of adult-fed meals per day increased rapidly during week one, but then declined over the rest of the nesting season (n = 10 broods). The amount of biomass fed directly by the female increased until about the fifth week, then decreased with a linear increase in the proportion of meals that the young feed to themselves. The estimated morsel size fed by the female to the nestlings ranged from 6 mm at hatching to 15 mm at fledging (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
, 378
Collopy, M. W. (1980). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
). Adults exhibited no bias in apportioning food, but the dominant nestling usually received food first (378
Collopy, M. W. (1980). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
, 530
Edwards, T. C., Jr., and M. W. Collopy (1983). Obligate and facultative brood reduction in eagles: an examination of factors that influence fratricide. Auk 100: 630–635.
).
Young eagles begin self-feeding at 34–37 days old, and successfully tear carcasses at 45–55 days of age. By week 8, young consume more food by self-feeding than they are fed by adults. The increase in self-feeding coincides with development of standing behavior.
Eaglets in multiple-young broods receive more food from adults than do eagles in 1-young broods (249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
), but prey delivery rates do not differ between the two (249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
). The rate at which prey were delivered to the nest during brood-rearing averaged two items per day in southwestern Idaho (range 1–3) and one item per day in western Texas (376
Lockhart, J. M. (1976). The food habits, status and ecology of nesting Golden Eagles in the Trans-Pecos region of Texas. M.S. thesis, Sul Ross State University, Alpine, TX, USA.
, 249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
). On average, eagles delivered larger prey in Idaho (1,153 g) than in Texas (947 g). Mean delivery rates in southwestern Idaho increased from 2 per day during first 5 weeks of brood-rearing to 3 per day during weeks 6 and 7, then decreased to 2 per day during the final 2 weeks.
Both sexes hunt throughout the brood-rearing period (249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
). Over the course of the nesting season in southwestern Idaho (249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
), males delivered more prey per day (1 delivery/d ± 0.28 SE; 1,030 g/d ± 284.6 SE; n = 8) than do females (0.6 deliveries/d ± 0.44 SE; 387 g/d ± 270 SE; n = 8). Males provided almost all food during the first two weeks (83% of deliveries and 95% biomass). Females increased the rate of prey deliveries in the third week of brood-rearing, with their maximum contribution in weeks 7–9 (43% of biomass). Delivery rates were similar for sexes during weeks 7–10. The size of delivered prey did not differ between the male and the female, but it does differ among nesting pairs (249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
).
Few data exist on provisioning behavior on breeding grounds after fledging. During the post-fledging period at one nest in the United Kingdom, the male parent delivered food at perches near the nest (398
Walker, D. G. (1987). Observations on the post-fledging period of the Golden Eagle, Aquila chrysaetos, in England. Ibis 129: 92–96.
). In southwestern Idaho, females made < 5% of prey deliveries to fledged young (M. Collopy, personal communication). An adult eagle in Arizona transferred prey to an 8-month old juvenile (29
Palmer, R. S. (Editor) (1988). Diurnal raptors. In Handbook of North American Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. pp. 324–380.
).
There is no conclusive evidence that eagles feed their offspring when away from their territory and there is no evidence that migratory adults winter with their offspring. However, a camera trap placed over a deer carcass on wintering grounds in Virginia captured an image of a juvenile eagle apparently food begging from an adult (TEK). The relationship between the two birds and the context for the behavior both were unclear.
Nest Sanitation
As early as the first day after hatching, young are able to expel feces several centimeters outside the nest bowl. By day 30, young consistently defecate over the nest rim (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
). Food accumulates at nests, and nests may contain prey in various stages of decomposition (MNK, CLM, EHC). Adults are thought to sometimes remove or consume prey remains uneaten by young (374
MacPherson, H. P. (1910). The home-life of a Golden Eagle. Second edition. Witherby and Company, London, United Kingdom.
, 319
Hunsicker, G. R. (1972). Nesting behavior of the Golden Eagle, Aquila chrysaetos, in San Diego County, California. M.S. thesis, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
, 57
Hoechlin, D. R. (1974). Behavioral ecology of nesting Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in San Diego County. M.S. thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
). However, during 1,012 hours of observation of eight broods in Idaho, uneaten prey was never removed (337
Collopy, M. W. (1983). A comparison of direct observations and collections of prey remains in determining the diet of Golden Eagles. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 360–368.
). Parents also may remove dead nestlings (338
Palmar, C. E. (1954). Scotland's Golden Eagles at home. National Geographic Magazine 105: 273–286.
; USGS, unpublished data). Fat-laden prey that is not removed can result in oiling of nestlings (373
Katzner, T. E., D. Driscoll, R. E. Jackman, P. H. Bloom, J. L. Cooper, S. Living, T. Grubb, J. M. Doyle, D. A. Bell, J. E. DiDonato, and J. A. DeWoody (2018). Non-anthropogenic diet-based oiling of predatory birds. Journal of Raptor Research 52: 82–88.
).
Adult eagles bring in green plant material throughout the season to cover debris or perhaps to repel ectoparasites (505
Wimberger, P. H. (1984). The use of green plant material in bird nests to avoid ectoparasites. Auk 101(3):615–618.
, 2
Watson, J. (2010). The Golden Eagle. Second edition. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, United Kingdom.
, 535
Dudek, B. M. (2017). The role of disease and ectoparasites in the ecology of nestling Golden Eagles. M.S. thesis, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA.
). In southwestern Idaho, adults select gray rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa) as nest material. This plant is, relative to other local plants, higher in concentrations of phenols. Evidence suggests that addition of this material reduced numbers of ectoparasites on nestlings (535
Dudek, B. M. (2017). The role of disease and ectoparasites in the ecology of nestling Golden Eagles. M.S. thesis, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA.
). This is important because ectoparasites can be abundant in nest material and can have negative effects on nestling eagles (see Demography and Populations: Disease and Body Parasites).
Carrying of Young
Reports of parents carrying fledging-age young are rare and anecdotal (n = 4) (29
Palmer, R. S. (Editor) (1988). Diurnal raptors. In Handbook of North American Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. pp. 324–380.
). This behavior has not been recorded during a large number of other intensive studies of eagle behavior (306
Dunstan, T. C., J. H. Harper, and K. B. Phipps (1978). Habitat use and hunting strategies of Prairie Falcons, Red-tailed Hawks, and Golden Eagles. Report submitted to Bureau of Land Management, Denver, CO, USA.
, 78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
, 378
Collopy, M. W. (1980). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
, 398
Walker, D. G. (1987). Observations on the post-fledging period of the Golden Eagle, Aquila chrysaetos, in England. Ibis 129: 92–96.
, 400
Bahat, O. (1992). Post-fledging movements of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos homeyeri) in the Negev Desert, Israel, as determined by radio-telemetry. In Wildlife Telemetry: Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals (I. G. Priede and S. M. Swift, Editors), Ellis Horwood Ltd., New York, NY, USA. pp. 612–621.
, 396
O'Toole, L. T., P. L. Kennedy, R. L. Knight, and L. C. McEwen (1999). Postfledging behavior of Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 111: 472–477.
).
No indication of cooperative breeding (i.e., non-breeding helpers at the nest). However, there are occasional reports of breeding trios (see Behavior: Sexual Behavior).
Brood Parasitism by Other Species
None reported.
Fledgling Stage
Departure from Nest
For several weeks prior to fledging, nestlings flap their wings and hop, apparently as a means to practice wing flapping and gain strength in the muscles required for flight (78
Ellis, D. H. (1979). Development of behavior in the Golden Eagle. Wildlife Monographs 70:1–94.
). The intensity of this behavior increases as fledging approaches (see Breeding: Young Birds). Young have successfully left nests as early as 45 days of age (Steenhof et al. 2017, USGS, unpublished data) and as late as 81 days (390
Gordon, S. (1955). The Golden Eagle; King of Birds. Citadel Press, New York, NY, USA.
). In southwestern Idaho, 101 eaglets from 61 broods departed from the nest at an average age of 64 d (range 45–77 d) (515
Steenhof, K., M. N. Kochert, C. L. McIntyre, and J. L. Brown (2017). Coming to terms about describing Golden Eagle reproduction. Journal of Raptor Research 51(3): 378–390
; USGS, unpublished data). Half of these young fledged by 65 days of age, and nearly 75% of the young had left their nests by 70 days. Mean age at first flight is 10 wk (n = 28) in western North Dakota (396
O'Toole, L. T., P. L. Kennedy, R. L. Knight, and L. C. McEwen (1999). Postfledging behavior of Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 111: 472–477.
).
Adults may facilitate fledging by decreasing prey deliveries during the last few weeks of brood-rearing (249
Collopy, M. W. (1984). Parental care and feeding ecology of Golden Eagle nestlings. Auk 101: 753–760.
). There is no evidence, other than a single anecdotal report (536
Miller, L. (1918a). First flights of a young Golden Eagle. Condor 20: 212.
), that adults force young out of nests. Departure from the nest can occur by the young falling, jumping, walking, or flying. Flying in this case is most often gliding, and rarely powered flapping flight. Departure usually involves the young jumping off or being blown out of the nest while wing flapping. Post-departure, the bird usually flaps in a series of short, stiff, wing-beats and then glides a short distance, followed by an uncontrolled landing (472
Camenzind, F. J. (1969). Nesting ecology and behavior of the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos L. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series 10(4):4–15, 35–36.
, CLM, EHC); this is sometimes accompanied by a series of loud, vocalizations (EHC).
Stressors can cause nestlings to jump or fall from the nest before being capable of flight. In southwestern Idaho, early fledging is usually associated with eaglets exposed to heavy nest parasite infestation or heat stress from sun exposure (535
Dudek, B. M. (2017). The role of disease and ectoparasites in the ecology of nestling Golden Eagles. M.S. thesis, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA.
, MNK). This behavior can result in death and therefore can be an important cause of nest failure (see Demography and Populations: Disease and Body Parasites). Young that leave the nest before they are capable of flight are usually fed and cared for by the parents (345
Hickman, G. L. (1968). The ecology and breeding biology of the Golden Eagle in southwestern Idaho and southeastern Oregon. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washington, DC, USA.
, MNK, CLM). In one case, a nestling fell out of a cliff nest in Washington, and the parents continued to provision it while building a new nest on the ground next to the nestling (537
Base, D. L., S. Zender, and J. W. Watson (2007). Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) build new nest below cliff and provision fallen nestlings. Journal of Raptor Research 41: 76–77.
).
Growth
After fledging, muscle mass of juveniles develops, and flight feathers reach full growth (24
Jollie, M. (1947). Plumage changes in the Golden Eagle. Auk 64: 549–576.
). Because skeletal growth usually ceases prior to fledging (378
Collopy, M. W. (1980). Food consumption and growth energetics of nestling Golden Eagles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
), body mass of fledglings fluctuates depending on food intake.
Flying ability of juveniles develops slowly, partly a consequence of incomplete flight-feather growth (398
Walker, D. G. (1987). Observations on the post-fledging period of the Golden Eagle, Aquila chrysaetos, in England. Ibis 129: 92–96.
). Sustained flight usually is not achieved until > 64 days of age (32
Brown, L. H., and D. Amadon (1968). Eagles, Hawks, and Falcons of the World. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.
). In Israel, females develop flying skills, fly longer distances, and move farther from their nest, sooner than do males (400
Bahat, O. (1992). Post-fledging movements of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos homeyeri) in the Negev Desert, Israel, as determined by radio-telemetry. In Wildlife Telemetry: Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals (I. G. Priede and S. M. Swift, Editors), Ellis Horwood Ltd., New York, NY, USA. pp. 612–621.
). Distance of fledglings from the nest increases significantly with time in western North Dakota, but the sexes do not differ in the distance they move (396
O'Toole, L. T., P. L. Kennedy, R. L. Knight, and L. C. McEwen (1999). Postfledging behavior of Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 111: 472–477.
). In that same study, movements > 5 km were not observed until > 29 days after fledging, and movements > 10 km not until > 98 days after fledging (396
O'Toole, L. T., P. L. Kennedy, R. L. Knight, and L. C. McEwen (1999). Postfledging behavior of Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 111: 472–477.
). First hunting attempts occur 28–68 days after fledging in Alaska, Israel, and England (398
Walker, D. G. (1987). Observations on the post-fledging period of the Golden Eagle, Aquila chrysaetos, in England. Ibis 129: 92–96.
, 400
Bahat, O. (1992). Post-fledging movements of Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos homeyeri) in the Negev Desert, Israel, as determined by radio-telemetry. In Wildlife Telemetry: Remote Monitoring and Tracking of Animals (I. G. Priede and S. M. Swift, Editors), Ellis Horwood Ltd., New York, NY, USA. pp. 612–621.
, CLM). Young may feed at carcasses 35 days after fledging, and bathe 30 days after fledging (398
Walker, D. G. (1987). Observations on the post-fledging period of the Golden Eagle, Aquila chrysaetos, in England. Ibis 129: 92–96.
).
Immature Stage
Post-fledgling Independence
Characteristics of movements after fledging vary by geographic region and migratory status. For migratory populations, dependence is shorter than it is for non-migratory populations. In Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, dispersal and independence occurs 50 days (range 39–63) after fledging and coincides with initiation of migration (269
McIntyre, C. L., and M. W. Collopy (2006). Postfledging dependence period of migratory Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Auk 123(3): 877–884.
). Dependence on parents is probably also ≤ 2 months throughout northern Alaska, where early winters require an early start to migration (172
Kessel, B. (1989). Birds of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska: Their Biogeography, Seasonality and Natural History. University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks, AK, USA.
, 269
McIntyre, C. L., and M. W. Collopy (2006). Postfledging dependence period of migratory Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Auk 123(3): 877–884.
).
In populations where migration usually does not occur, dependence is relatively longer. In the United Kingdom, fledglings stay ≤ 70 m from the nest for 2 weeks (398
Walker, D. G. (1987). Observations on the post-fledging period of the Golden Eagle, Aquila chrysaetos, in England. Ibis 129: 92–96.
). Independence of those birds appears to start 75–85 days after fledging, when adults begin territorial defense displays toward their young (534
Walker, D. G. (1988). The behaviour and movements of a juvenile Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos in England in 1986. Ibis 130: 564.
). For 66 tracked fledglings in the Colorado Plateau and southern Rocky Mountains, the time between fledging date and the onset of dispersal is 4–9 months (104
Murphy, R. K., J. R. Dunk, B. Woodbridge, D. W. Stahlecker, D. W. LaPlante, B. A. Millsap, and K. V. Jacobson (2017). First-year dispersal of Golden Eagles from natal areas in the southwestern United States and implications for second-year settling. Journal of Raptor Research 51(3): 216–233.
). Two young telemetered in the Mojave Desert dispersed from their natal territory 5 months after fledging in May (TEK, TAM). Seven telemetered young left their natal territory in southwestern Idaho in 3 to 7 months (mean = 4) after fledging (USGS, unpublished data), and 9 telemetered young in southwestern Montana left their nesting territory 3–9 months (mean = 4) after fledging (R. Crandall, unpublished data).
A number of factors may influence timing of dispersal from the natal area. Murphy et al. (104
Murphy, R. K., J. R. Dunk, B. Woodbridge, D. W. Stahlecker, D. W. LaPlante, B. A. Millsap, and K. V. Jacobson (2017). First-year dispersal of Golden Eagles from natal areas in the southwestern United States and implications for second-year settling. Journal of Raptor Research 51(3): 216–233.
) detected no overall sex bias in the timing of dispersal for 40 male and 26 female young. However, among birds dispersing short distances (< 120 km), males tended to disperse earlier than females. Likewise, Murphy et al. (104
Murphy, R. K., J. R. Dunk, B. Woodbridge, D. W. Stahlecker, D. W. LaPlante, B. A. Millsap, and K. V. Jacobson (2017). First-year dispersal of Golden Eagles from natal areas in the southwestern United States and implications for second-year settling. Journal of Raptor Research 51(3): 216–233.
) also found no overall relationship between age and date of the onset of dispersal, but longer-distance dispersers initiated movements at younger ages than did shorter-distance dispersers. Similarly, in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, hatching date did not predict the date on which eagles departed their natal area, but the post-fledging dependence period was generally longer for fledglings that hatched early (269
McIntyre, C. L., and M. W. Collopy (2006). Postfledging dependence period of migratory Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Auk 123(3): 877–884.
).
Siblings occasionally disperse together. After fledging in western North Dakota, siblings moved together and usually stayed within 300 m of each other up to 121 days after fledging (396
O'Toole, L. T., P. L. Kennedy, R. L. Knight, and L. C. McEwen (1999). Postfledging behavior of Golden Eagles. Wilson Bulletin 111: 472–477.
). In contrast, sibling fledglings from Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska, leave their natal area from 1 to 13 days apart and within 60 days of fledging, and they do not stay together once they leave their natal area (269
McIntyre, C. L., and M. W. Collopy (2006). Postfledging dependence period of migratory Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Auk 123(3): 877–884.
). There is no evidence that young accompany parents at the onset of autumn migration or that siblings migrate together (269
McIntyre, C. L., and M. W. Collopy (2006). Postfledging dependence period of migratory Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Auk 123(3): 877–884.
). Similarly, in the Colorado Plateau and the southern Rocky Mountains, dispersal dates of siblings differ by as little as three days or as much as 3–5 months (104
Murphy, R. K., J. R. Dunk, B. Woodbridge, D. W. Stahlecker, D. W. LaPlante, B. A. Millsap, and K. V. Jacobson (2017). First-year dispersal of Golden Eagles from natal areas in the southwestern United States and implications for second-year settling. Journal of Raptor Research 51(3): 216–233.
).
Recommended Citation
Katzner, T. E., M. N. Kochert, K. Steenhof, C. L. McIntyre, E. H. Craig, and T. A. Miller (2020). Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), version 2.0. In Birds of the World (P. G. Rodewald and B. K. Keeney, Editors). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.goleag.02