Species names in all available languages
|Bulgarian||Канадски крайбрежен бекас|
|English (United States)||Hudsonian Godwit|
|French (France)||Barge hudsonienne|
|Haitian Creole (Haiti)||Kouli vant blanch|
|Romanian||Sitar de mal cu aripi negre|
|Spanish (Argentina)||Becasa de Mar|
|Spanish (Chile)||Zarapito de pico recto|
|Spanish (Costa Rica)||Aguja Lomiblanca|
|Spanish (Cuba)||Avoceta pechirroja|
|Spanish (Dominican Republic)||Barga Aliblanca|
|Spanish (Ecuador)||Aguja Hudsoniana (de Hudson)|
|Spanish (Honduras)||Picopando del Este|
|Spanish (Mexico)||Picopando del Este|
|Spanish (Panama)||Aguja Lomiblanca|
|Spanish (Paraguay)||Becasa de mar|
|Spanish (Peru)||Aguja de Mar|
|Spanish (Puerto Rico)||Barga Aliblanca|
|Spanish (Spain)||Aguja café|
|Spanish (Uruguay)||Becasa de Mar|
|Spanish (Venezuela)||Becasa de Mar|
Limosa haemastica (Linnaeus, 1758)
The Key to Scientific Names
Hudsonian Godwit Limosa haemastica Scientific name definitions
Version: 1.0 — Published March 4, 2020
Text last updated October 21, 2011
Account navigation Account navigation
Large shorebird with long legs and long, slightly upturned bill. Size quite variable (360–420 mm), with females averaging heavier (246–358 g) than males (196–266 g; Hayman et al. 1986, Piersma et al. 1996c, J. R. Jehl, Jr., pers. comm.). Also sexually dimorphic in plumage. In Alternate plumage, adult males have dark-reddish underparts with scattered darker barring and blackish upperparts with variable pale spotting. Females paler overall, more mottled above and with less extensive dark rufous below. In both sexes, a white band crosses most caudal portions of upperparts including bases of outer rectrices; a white stripe extends across the wing; and the bill is bicolored, with a pinkish-red base, becoming orange in males during courtship, and dark tip (Sutton 1968b). Individuals in Basic plumage retain white band on rear upperparts and wing-stripe, but remaining body plumage becomes pale gray-brown with a white belly, white supercilia, and dark lores. Juvenile plumage browner than Basic, with some buff fringing to back feathers and brown-buff below (Hayman et al. 1986, Paulson 1993).
Size, dark legs, and very long, relatively straight, bicolored bill separate godwits from other shorebirds; snipes and dowitchers superficially similar in appearance, but much smaller. In all plumages, Hudsonian Godwit most easily identified in flight. Combination of white wing-stripe, dark axillaries and underwing coverts, and dark tail with a broad white band at the base is diagnostic (Hayman et al. 1986). Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa), a Palearctic species recorded rarely in w. Alaska and casually in e. North America, is similar, but has white wing-linings; a broader, longer, wing-stripe; and a broader white band on the rear upperparts that is at least the breadth of the black tail-band. Larger Marbled Godwit (L. fedoa) is predominantly cinnamon-brown and lacks conspicuous wing-stripe and tail pattern. Bar-tailed Godwit (L. lapponica) also lacks an obvious wing-stripe and a wide black tail-band; race found in Europe (L. l. lapponica) also has more extensive white on tail, with a triangular extension up the lower back and with barring to tail tip, while race found in Alaska (L. l. baueri) lacks extensive white on tail entirely. Feet of Hudsonian Godwit extend well beyond the tail in flight, more like a Black-tailed Godwit than a Bar-tailed (Grieve 1987, Higgins and Davies 1996, Eckert 1999a).
Standing Hudsonian Godwit is not easily distinguished from Black-tailed and Bar-tailed godwits, and identifications should be made cautiously. In general, however, Hudsonian Godwit looks smaller and darker than these other species. Black-tailed Godwit typically has straighter, less tapered bill and longer legs and neck, which give a taller appearance. European race of Black-tailed Godwit (L. l. limosa) is generally larger than Hudsonian Godwit; Icelandic (L. l. islandica) and Siberian (L. l. melanuroides) races are closer in size, although size varies considerably in all taxa. Male Hudsonian Godwit in Alternate plumage has darker red underparts, especially toward the vent, than does Black-tailed Godwit. Icelandic and Siberian races of Black-tailed Godwit are more similar to Hudsonian, with more extensive red on the underparts than the European race, in which red barely reaches belly (Prater et al. 1977, Cramp and Simmons 1983). Face and neck of Hudsonian grayer and more contrasting than Black-tailed Godwit, which has orange-red neck, but this feature may be variable, especially in molting birds (Grieve 1987). In Basic plumage, both Hudsonian and Black-tailed godwits have plain-gray upperparts and pale underparts and look very similar. Supercilium of Hudsonian is slightly broader in front of the eye, but reliability of this feature is unclear. Juvenile plumages also similar; but Hudsonian averages duller with more buff on neck and underparts (Higgins and Davies 1996).
Hudsonian Godwit is closer in shape to Bar-tailed Godwit than to Black-tailed. In Alternate plumage, the red on the underparts of male Hudsonian and Bar-tailed godwits extends to the vent, but Bar-tailed generally has paler red with less distinct barring. Head of Alternate plumage male Hudsonian usually paler than body, unlike Bar-tailed. Females of both species have less red than males, but female Bar-tailed much paler, especially on belly and vent. Upperparts of Alternate Bar-tailed paler and more heavily patterned than Hudsonian. In other plumages, Bar-tailed also tends to be more heavily patterned above than Hudsonian. Facial pattern may also aid identification, although overlap occurs; compared to Bar-tailed, Hudsonian tends to have darker lores and paler supercilia that does not extend far behind the eye (Hayman et al. 1986, Chandler 1989a, Paulson 1993). See also McCaffery and Gill 2001 .
In Basic plumage, confusion with Willet (Tringa semipalmata) also possible, but Hudsonian Godwit has longer bill with pink at base and dark legs compared to Willet's heavier, darker bill and blue-gray legs.